Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

HOEGH GALLEON

IMO: 9820013
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.79 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Hoegh LNG Fleet Management AS

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

288.8 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 204.5 kg/nm (+41%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

57.18

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.39 (+674%)

Average speed

13.6 kn

LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

94.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,174 t

CO₂ emitted

15,667 t

16,912 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

17,914 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,318 h

55 days, 15% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 288.8 kg/nm · median 204.5 (+41%)

147.8Ranks 244 of 312, lowest first328.0

Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 14.6 (−7%)

11.0Faster than 33% of LNG carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 57.18 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (+674%)

4.54Ranks 307 of 312, lowest first17.34

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU10%
Into the EU83%
At berth in the EU2%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (8,370 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

36.9 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.079

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HOEGH GALLEON
LNG carrier median

200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

HOEGH GALLEON
LNG carrier median

12.013.014.015.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

HOEGH GALLEON
LNG carrier median

0.020.040.060.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−1.2 kn	−4%	−12%	−47%	+468%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.5 kn	+3%	+24%	+16%	+17%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.7 kn	+9%	−4%	−43%	−11%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+14%	+13%	+66%	−26%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	−15%	−19%	+471%	+168%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	Hoegh LNG Fleet Management AS	5,174	15,667	17,914	1,318	13.6	288.8	–	–
2023LNG	not published	10,285	28,375	34,080	2,297	14.8	301.8	–	–
2022LNG	not published	8,615	24,332	29,464	2,392	12.3	292.4	–	–
2021LNG	not published	13,939	38,706	52,007	3,706	14.0	268.0	–	–
2020LNG	not published	7,321	20,233	31,261	2,205	14.2	234.2	–	–
2019LNG	not published	1,514	4,169	5,470	368	14.9	276.8	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Hoegh LNG Fleet Management AS	57.18	7.39	+674%	307 of 312	DNV	B+C
2023LNG	not published	10.06	9.10	+11%	203 of 355	DNV	B+C
2022LNG	not published	8.62	10.38	−17%	146 of 379	DNV	A+C
2021LNG	not published	9.64	10.46	−8%	131 of 289	DNV	A+C
2020LNG	not published	12.94	10.71	+21%	187 of 267	DNV	A+C
2019LNG	not published	4.83	10.87	−56%	7 of 248	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.