Navalyze · Container · Ship

EVER GRADE

IMO: 9820855
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 85,078 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.69 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Synergy Marine Pte Ltd · part of Synergy Marine

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 142,776 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

361

Container median 174 kg/nm (+107%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.91

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−58%)

Average speed

19.0 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+39%)

Fuel per day at sea

165.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,411 t

CO₂ emitted

60,669 t

Distance sailed

53,720 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,822 h

118 days, 32% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 326 kg/nm · median 177 (+84%)

78.8Ranks 2,087 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.1 kn · median 13.3 (+21%)

9.1Faster than 91% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−27%)

7.22Ranks 788 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU40%
Into the EU52%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,336 t

3.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EVER GRADE
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EVER GRADE
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EVER GRADE
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	+3%	+3%	+8%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.2 kn	+10%	+20%	+14%	–	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−9%	−8%	+10%	+21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.6 kn	−17%	−29%	−14%	−14%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.1 kn	+15%	+22%	+23%	+7%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−2.8 kn	−9%	−22%	−1%	−9%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Synergy Marine Pte Ltd	12,140	37,915	38,359	2,456	15.6	317	54.4	–
2025	SYNERGY PACIFIC PRIVATE LIMITED	25,231	78,765	77,473	4,814	16.1	326	12.0	–
2024	Synergy Marine Pte Ltd	22,637	70,560	71,532	4,459	16.0	317	–	–
2023	not published	17,980	56,065	62,600	4,237	14.8	287	8.07	–
2022	not published	17,821	55,606	56,724	3,852	14.7	314	6.68	–
2021	not published	24,766	77,294	65,660	3,788	17.3	377	7.74	–
2020	not published	17,561	54,699	53,319	3,290	16.2	329	7.21	–
2019	not published	19,411	60,669	53,720	2,822	19.0	361	7.91	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Synergy Marine Pte Ltd	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A+B
2025	SYNERGY PACIFIC PRIVATE LIMITED	12.0	16.3	−27%	788 of 2,208	ClassNK	B+C
2024	Synergy Marine Pte Ltd	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A+B
2023	not published	8.07	19.4	−58%	253 of 1,899	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	6.68	19.1	−65%	100 of 1,825	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	7.74	17.9	−57%	175 of 1,781	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	7.21	17.6	−59%	183 of 1,797	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	7.91	18.9	−58%	184 of 1,788	ClassNK	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.