Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

HOEGH GANNET

IMO: 9822451
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.09 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

346.0 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 230.7 kg/nm (+50%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

36.54

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+302%)

Average speed

11.0 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−23%)

Fuel per day at sea

91.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

536 t

CO₂ emitted

1,577 t

Distance sailed

1,549 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

140 h

6 days, 2% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 346.0 kg/nm · median 230.7 (+50%)

166.5Ranks 304 of 355, lowest first358.9

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 14.2 (−23%)

10.7Faster than 11% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 36.54 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+302%)

5.47Ranks 340 of 355, lowest first17.94

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports79%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU21%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

21.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HOEGH GANNET
LNG carrier median

200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

HOEGH GANNET
LNG carrier median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

HOEGH GANNET
LNG carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	+8%	+7%	−95%	+193%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.9 kn	+27%	+1%	+39%	+32%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.9 kn	−20%	−14%	−39%	−16%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.7 kn	+32%	+16%	+108%	–	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 32%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2023LNG	not published	536	1,577	1,549	140	11.0	346.0	–	–
2022LNG	not published	10,619	30,689	33,296	2,966	11.2	318.9	–	–
2021LNG	not published	6,010	16,546	23,881	1,696	14.1	251.7	–	–
2020LNG	not published	12,254	33,733	39,120	2,971	13.2	313.2	–	–
2019LNG	not published	4,476	12,335	18,837	1,262	14.9	237.6	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023LNG	not published	36.54	9.10	+302%	340 of 355	DNV	B+C
2022LNG	not published	12.46	10.38	+20%	252 of 379	DNV	A+C
2021LNG	not published	9.45	10.46	−10%	126 of 289	DNV	A+C
2020LNG	not published	11.27	10.71	+5%	153 of 267	DNV	A+C
2019LNG	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.