Navalyze · Container · Ship

TUKUMA ARCTICA

IMO: 9822865
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 8,463 t
Port of registry: Aarhus
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.45 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Royal Arctic Line A/S

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,463 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

111.9 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−37%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

42.26

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+159%)

Average speed

15.6 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

42.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,133 t

CO₂ emitted

32,377 t

32,874 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

90,526 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,794 h

241 days, 66% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 111.9 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−37%)

78.8Ranks 636 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 15.6 kn · median 13.3 (+17%)

9.1Faster than 85% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 42.26 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+159%)

7.22Ranks 1,919 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports36%
From the EU29%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU4%

70% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (22,550 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.5 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

TUKUMA ARCTICA
Container median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TUKUMA ARCTICA
Container median

13.014.015.016.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TUKUMA ARCTICA
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−11%	−9%	−4%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−8%	−8%	+11%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	+4%	+6%	−4%	−3%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	−1%	−6%	+1%	+3%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	+18%	+28%	+21%	−2%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Royal Arctic Line A/S	10,133	32,377	90,526	5,794	15.6	111.9	42.26	–
2024	Royal Arctic Line A/S	11,867	37,032	94,126	6,134	15.3	126.1	51.46	–
2023	not published	11,633	36,287	85,110	5,525	15.4	136.7	57.41	–
2022	not published	11,634	36,285	88,369	5,882	15.0	131.7	59.25	–
2021	not published	11,578	36,123	87,180	5,504	15.8	132.8	57.47	–
2020	not published	8,121	25,355	71,835	4,937	14.6	113.0	58.61	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Royal Arctic Line A/S	42.26	16.30	+159%	1,919 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	Royal Arctic Line A/S	51.46	17.52	+194%	1,775 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	57.41	19.40	+196%	1,764 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	59.25	19.13	+210%	1,705 of 1,825	DNV	A+C
2021	not published	57.47	17.90	+221%	1,658 of 1,781	DNV	A+C
2020	not published	58.61	17.58	+233%	1,675 of 1,797	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.