Navalyze · Container · Ship

TUKUMA ARCTICA

IMO: 9822865
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 8,463 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Aarhus
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.45 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Royal Arctic Line A/S

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,930 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

132

Container median 178 kg/nm (−26%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

59.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+210%)

Average speed

15.0 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

47.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,634 t

CO₂ emitted

36,285 t

Distance sailed

88,369 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,882 h

245 days, 67% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 112 kg/nm · median 177 (−37%)

78.8Ranks 636 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.6 kn · median 13.3 (+17%)

9.1Faster than 85% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 42.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+159%)

7.22Ranks 1,919 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU43%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,284 t

3.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TUKUMA ARCTICA
Container median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TUKUMA ARCTICA
Container median

13.014.015.016.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TUKUMA ARCTICA
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−11%	−9%	−4%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−8%	−8%	+11%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	+4%	+6%	−4%	−3%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	−1%	−6%	+1%	+3%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	+18%	+28%	+21%	−2%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Royal Arctic Line A/S	10,133	32,377	90,526	5,794	15.6	112	42.3	–
2024	Royal Arctic Line A/S	11,867	37,032	94,126	6,134	15.3	126	51.5	–
2023	not published	11,633	36,287	85,110	5,525	15.4	137	57.4	–
2022	not published	11,634	36,285	88,369	5,882	15.0	132	59.3	–
2021	not published	11,578	36,123	87,180	5,504	15.8	133	57.5	–
2020	not published	8,121	25,355	71,835	4,937	14.6	113	58.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Royal Arctic Line A/S	42.3	16.3	+159%	1,919 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	Royal Arctic Line A/S	51.5	17.5	+194%	1,775 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	57.4	19.4	+196%	1,764 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	59.3	19.1	+210%	1,705 of 1,825	DNV	A+C
2021	not published	57.5	17.9	+221%	1,658 of 1,781	DNV	A+C
2020	not published	58.6	17.6	+233%	1,675 of 1,797	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.