Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

ALEXANDER

IMO: 9826720
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 74,567 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEDI 3.27 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB
Former names: GAGARIN PROSPECT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: POLO CRUDE CARRIERS S.A.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 74,567 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

160.0 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (+25%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.82

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (−14%)

Average speed

11.0 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

42.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,177 t

CO₂ emitted

10,100 t

10,256 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

19,860 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,800 h

75 days, 21% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 160.0 kg/nm · median 128.5 (+25%)

76.1Ranks 1,294 of 1,665, lowest first190.8

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 10.7 (+3%)

8.0Faster than 59% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.82 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−14%)

4.51Ranks 614 of 1,665, lowest first27.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU17%
Into the EU74%
At berth in the EU9%

55% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,511 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

9.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ALEXANDER
Oil tanker median

120.0130.0140.0150.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ALEXANDER
Oil tanker median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ALEXANDER
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.1 kn	+15%	+27%	−22%	–	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.9 kn	+1%	−15%	+189%	–	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	+6%	+7%	+83%	+44%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2022	+0.6 kn	−12%	−7%	−89%	−46%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.7 kn	+3%	+21%	−11%	−23%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.4 kn	−2%	−15%	+252%	−9%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	POLO CRUDE CARRIERS S.A.	3,177	10,100	19,860	1,800	11.0	160.0	6.82	–
2024	POLO CRUDE CARRIERS S.A.	3,559	11,195	25,492	2,568	9.9	139.6	–	–
2023	not published	1,227	3,877	8,835	750	11.8	138.9	6.45	–
2022	not published	633	2,012	4,834	413	11.7	130.9	4.48	–
2020LNG	not published	6,868	19,735	45,998	4,162	11.1	149.3	8.24	–
2019	not published	7,514	22,744	51,864	5,534	9.4	144.9	10.66	–
2018LNG	not published	2,187	6,384	14,753	1,366	10.8	148.3	11.71	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	POLO CRUDE CARRIERS S.A.	6.82	7.95	−14%	614 of 1,665	Verifavia	A
2024	POLO CRUDE CARRIERS S.A.	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	6.45	8.44	−24%	537 of 1,797	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	4.48	8.51	−47%	137 of 1,961	Indian Register of Shipping	A
2020LNG	not published	8.24	9.03	−9%	810 of 1,870	ABS	C
2019	not published	10.66	8.83	+21%	1,240 of 1,919	ABS	C
2018LNG	not published	11.71	8.86	+32%	1,208 of 1,779	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.