Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM MEXICO

IMO
9839911
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
100,548 t
Flag (estimated)
Singapore
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EEXI 7.47 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Seaspan Ship Management Ltd.

?
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 107,798 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
259
Container median 172 kg/nm (+51%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
7.51
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−57%)
Average speed
16.0 kn
Container median 14.0 kn (+14%)
Fuel per day at sea
99.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
12,239 t
CO₂ emitted
38,190 t
Distance sailed
47,173 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,947 h
123 days, 34% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 230 kg/nm · median 177 (+30%)
78.8Ranks 1,479 of 2,208, lowest first302
Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 13.3 (+4%)
9.1Faster than 57% of container ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.13 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−56%)
7.22Ranks 212 of 2,208, lowest first46.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports20%
  • From the EU17%
  • Into the EU61%
  • At berth in the EU3%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,115 t
2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • CMA CGM MEXICO
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • CMA CGM MEXICO
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CMA CGM MEXICO
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2020→2025−2.2 kn−11%−23%−57%−5%2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+1.7 kn−7%+4%+81%+44%1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Seaspan Ship Management Ltd.4,67814,59120,3531,47113.82307.13–
2020not published12,23938,19047,1732,94716.02597.51–
2019not published7,24022,58925,9981,81914.32795.20–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2025Seaspan Ship Management Ltd.7.1316.3−56%212 of 2,208DNVB+C
2020not published7.5117.6−57%205 of 1,797ABSA
2019not published5.2018.9−72%7 of 1,788Lloyd's RegisterA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.