Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

GAS AGILITY

IMO: 9850680
Type: LNG carrier
Technical efficiency: EEDI 15.70 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Emerald Green Maritime ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

562.6 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

406

g CO₂/m³·nm

Average speed

5.8 kn

Fuel per day at sea

77.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,224 t

CO₂ emitted

6,078 t

7,762 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

3,952 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

687 h

29 days, 8% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2022

Set against all 379 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 708.5 kg/nm · median 252.4 (+181%)

173.5Ranks 378 of 379, lowest first379.8

Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 14.1 (−26%)

10.2Faster than 11% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 335.07 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.38 (+3,128%)

5.96Ranks 379 of 379, lowest first26.44

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports81%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU19%

93% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,677 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

18.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

57.7 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.277

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GAS AGILITY
LNG carrier median

0.0500.01,0001,500

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GAS AGILITY
LNG carrier median

0.05.010.015.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

GAS AGILITY
LNG carrier median

0.0200400600

’212021’222022

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	−21%	−4%	+41%	–	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.6 kn	−51%	−45%	+91%	–	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 51%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−6.3 kn	+104%	−18%	−62%	–	6.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 104%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.9 kn	+6%	−10%	−5%	−24%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+4.0 kn	+336%	+545%	−66%	–	4.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 336%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Emerald Green Maritime ltd	2,224	6,078	3,952	687	5.8	562.6	–	–
2024LNG	Emerald Green Maritime ltd	2,001	5,513	2,811	591	4.8	711.8	345.10	–
2023LNG	not published	2,131	6,056	1,471	346	4.2	1,448.8	16,006.15	–
2022	not published	2,727	8,462	3,849	365	10.5	708.5	–	–
2021LNG	not published	2,710	7,555	4,059	328	12.4	667.8	–	–
2020	not published	1,848	5,654	12,066	1,441	8.4	153.2	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Emerald Green Maritime ltd	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B
2024LNG	Emerald Green Maritime ltd	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B
2023LNG	not published	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	335.07	10.38	+3,128%	379 of 379	DNV	A+B+C
2021LNG	not published	438.95	10.46	+4,096%	289 of 289	DNV	A+B+C
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.