Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

CELSIUS CANBERRA

IMO: 9864796
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.59 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Celsius Tech Limited

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

170

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (−33%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

5.27

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (−49%)

Average speed

14.4 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

58.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,175 t

CO₂ emitted

31,782 t

Distance sailed

65,786 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,557 h

190 days, 52% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 168 kg/nm · median 190 (−12%)

152Ranks 94 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 14.4 (−6%)

11.2Faster than 33% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.48 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−23%)

5.06Ranks 82 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU47%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

5,856 t

52% of all fuel; 48% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

588 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CELSIUS CANBERRA
LNG carrier median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CELSIUS CANBERRA
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

CELSIUS CANBERRA
LNG carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.5 kn	+5%	−5%	−9%	+8%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−3%	−2%	+129%	−34%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	−3%	+0%	−77%	+47%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.7 kn	+2%	−8%	+58%	−10%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Celsius Tech Limited	5,329	14,488	31,773	2,330	13.6	168	–	–
2024LNG	Greenheart Gas Shipco II LLC	5,567	15,057	34,979	2,314	15.1	159	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	2,514	7,123	15,295	1,024	14.9	164	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	11,175	31,782	65,786	4,557	14.4	170	–	52%
2021LNG / alt.	not published	6,900	19,437	41,606	2,591	16.1	166	–	50%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Celsius Tech Limited	5.48	7.12	−23%	82 of 386	DNV	B+C
2024LNG	Greenheart Gas Shipco II LLC	5.07	7.39	−31%	52 of 312	DNV	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	7.74	9.10	−15%	140 of 355	DNV	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	5.27	10.4	−49%	16 of 379	ClassNK	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	5.84	10.5	−44%	32 of 289	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.