Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

KOOL ORCA

IMO
9870525
Type
LNG carrier
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 5.23 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel
Mostly LNG
Former names
SCF TIMMERMAN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Cool Company Management AS

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
197.4 kg/nm
LNG carrier median 190.4 kg/nm (+4%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
6.56
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.12 (−8%)
Average speed
14.7 kn
LNG carrier median 14.4 kn (+2%)
Fuel per day at sea
69.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
15,286 t
CO₂ emitted
41,565 t
50,318 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
77,437 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,262 h
219 days, 60% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 197.4 kg/nm · median 190.4 (+4%)
152.1Ranks 220 of 386, lowest first319.4
Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 14.4 (+2%)
11.2Faster than 57% of LNG carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 6.56 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−8%)
5.06Ranks 168 of 386, lowest first16.14
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU50%
  • Into the EU48%
  • At berth in the EU2%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (21,211 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
2.1%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
296.5 t
LNG engines slip unburnt methane
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.211
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • KOOL ORCA
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • KOOL ORCA
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • KOOL ORCA
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+0.0 kn−2%−2%+65%+17%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024+0.6 kn−11%−7%+31%−22%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−1.2 kn+13%+4%+229%+2%1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.4 kn+11%+15%+47%+1%0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025LNGCool Company Management AS15,28641,56577,4375,26214.7197.4––
2024LNGCool Company Management AS9,39325,85746,7983,17914.7200.7––
2023LNGnot published8,04122,80335,6102,52814.1225.8––
2022not published2,1626,48010,81370515.3200.0––
2021LNGnot published1,3163,6457,33349214.9179.5––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025LNGCool Company Management AS6.567.12−8%168 of 386DNVB+C
2024LNGCool Company Management AS5.627.39−24%86 of 312DNVB+C
2023LNGnot published7.189.10−21%118 of 355DNVB+C
2022not published7.0210.38−32%87 of 379DNVC
2021LNGnot published6.9810.46−33%64 of 289Indian Register of ShippingC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

KOOL ORCA (IMO 9870525): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2021–2025 | Navalyze