Navalyze · Cruise · Ship

NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC RESOLUTION

IMO: 9880685
Type: Passenger ship (Cruise Passenger ship)
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 24.15 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: PC5

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Lindblad Expeditions LLC

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

70.2 kg/nm

Cruise median 263.6 kg/nm (−73%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

2,461

g CO₂/pax·nm · Cruise median 521 (+372%)

Average speed

9.2 kn

Cruise median 13.1 kn (−30%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,121 t

CO₂ emitted

3,592 t

3,647 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

15,958 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,743 h

73 days, 20% of the year

Within the cruise fleet, 2025

Set against all 202 cruise ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 70.2 kg/nm · median 263.6 (−73%)

89.6Ranks 14 of 202, lowest first415.6

Average speedThis ship 9.2 kn · median 13.1 (−30%)

10.8Faster than 4% of cruise ships15.5

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 2,460.82 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 521.02 (+372%)

302.86Ranks 198 of 202, lowest first1,700.54

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Cruise medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports35%
From the EU23%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU6%

71% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,533 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Cruise median is the middle ship of all cruise ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC RESOLUTION
Cruise median

50.0100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0

’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC RESOLUTION
Cruise median

8.010.012.014.0

’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC RESOLUTION
Cruise median

0.01,0002,0003,0004,000

’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	−9%	−19%	+28%	−35%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Lindblad Expeditions LLC	1,121	3,592	15,958	1,743	9.2	70.2	–	–
2024	Lindblad Expeditions LLC	962	3,084	12,509	1,212	10.3	76.9	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Cruise median	vs Cruise	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Lindblad Expeditions LLC	2,460.82	521.02	+372%	198 of 202	DNV	C
2024	Lindblad Expeditions LLC	3,759.67	618.41	+508%	199 of 202	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Cruise ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's cruise ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.