Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AKTORAS

IMO: 9958286
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NLNG Ship Management Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

182.3 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 190.4 kg/nm (−4%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

8.00

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.12 (+12%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

LNG carrier median 14.4 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

56.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,286 t

CO₂ emitted

39,064 t

47,059 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

78,377 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,100 h

254 days, 70% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 182.3 kg/nm · median 190.4 (−4%)

152.1Ranks 160 of 386, lowest first319.4

Average speedThis ship 12.8 kn · median 14.4 (−11%)

11.2Faster than 20% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 8.00 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+12%)

5.06Ranks 229 of 386, lowest first16.14

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU63%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU2%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (19,896 t).

Fuel burned laden

36%

64% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

270.0 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.205

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

AKTORAS
LNG carrier median

180.0190.0200.0210.0220.0

’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AKTORAS
LNG carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

AKTORAS
LNG carrier median

7.07.37.57.88.0

’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+3.3 kn	−14%	+17%	+137%	+9%	3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025LNG	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	14,286	39,064	78,377	6,100	12.8	182.3	–	36%
2024LNG	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	6,964	19,334	33,004	3,484	9.5	211.0	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	8.00	7.12	+12%	229 of 386	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2024LNG	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	7.37	7.39	−0%	156 of 312	Lloyd's Register	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.