Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

MARKO POLO

IMO: 7230599
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Croatia
Port of registry: Rijeka
Technical efficiency: EEXI 46.43 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Jadrolinija Rijeka

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

108

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (−31%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

12.1

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 751 (−98%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

2.12

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 217 (−99%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−23%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,690 t

CO₂ emitted

8,625 t

Distance sailed

25,002 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,042 h

85 days, 23% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 109 kg/nm · median 150 (−27%)

69.3Ranks 105 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 15.8 (−22%)

12.0Faster than 12% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 146 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−74%)

66.8Ranks 103 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 605 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+139%)

48.6Ranks 292 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports75%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU25%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,189 t

25.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MARKO POLO
Ro-pax median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MARKO POLO
Ro-pax median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

MARKO POLO
Ro-pax median

0.0200400600800

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

MARKO POLO
Ro-pax median

0.02505007501,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	+11%	+20%	−9%	+2,329%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−1.8 kn	−11%	−23%	−6%	−92%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	+9%	+15%	+30%	−3%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	−13%	−11%	+13%	+863%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+8%	+8%	+9%	−32%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	−12%	−14%	−22%	+407%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	+11%	+10%	−3%	−51%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Jadrolinija Rijeka	3,755	12,039	34,451	2,773	12.4	109	–	–
2024	Jadrolinija	3,695	11,846	37,753	3,278	11.5	97.9	–	–
2023	not published	4,393	14,084	40,027	3,000	13.3	110	–	–
2022	not published	3,109	9,968	30,855	2,450	12.6	101	–	–
2021	not published	3,170	10,164	27,274	2,230	12.2	116	–	–
2020	not published	2,690	8,625	25,002	2,042	12.2	108	–	–
2019	not published	3,932	12,607	32,064	2,562	12.5	123	–	–
2018	not published	3,650	11,703	32,927	2,619	12.6	111	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Jadrolinija Rijeka	146	567	−74%	103 of 408	605	253	+139%	Verifavia	B
2024	Jadrolinija	6.01	547	−99%	24 of 404	3.89	233	−98%	Verifavia	B
2023	not published	77.4	680	−89%	41 of 386	793	234	+239%	Verifavia	B
2022	not published	79.4	626	−87%	49 of 394	584	253	+131%	Verifavia	B
2021	not published	8.25	815	−99%	8 of 377	2.15	226	−99%	CROATIAN REGISTER OF SHIPPING	B
2020	not published	12.1	751	−98%	23 of 387	2.12	217	−99%	CROATIAN REGISTER OF SHIPPING	B
2019	not published	2.38	569	−100%	19 of 394	1.46	223	−99%	CROATIAN REGISTER OF SHIPPING	B
2018	not published	4.90	729	−99%	31 of 361	2.35	184	−99%	CROATIAN REGISTER OF SHIPPING	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.