Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

MOBY KISS

IMO
7358755
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Napoli
Technical efficiency
EEXI 46.82 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOBY SPA

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
116.6 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (−22%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
2,136
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+277%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
182
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−28%)
Average speed
12.8 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−19%)
Fuel per day at sea
35.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
3,368 t
CO₂ emitted
10,797 t
10,962 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
28,896 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,263 h
94 days, 26% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 116.6 kg/nm · median 150.2 (−22%)
69.3Ranks 113 of 408, lowest first232.4
Average speedThis ship 12.8 kn · median 15.8 (−19%)
12.0Faster than 14% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 2,135.89 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+277%)
66.76Ranks 385 of 408, lowest first1,568.87
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 181.55 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (−28%)
48.59Ranks 161 of 408, lowest first1,247.19
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports83%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU17%

4% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (461 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
17.0%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.2 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.015
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • MOBY KISS
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • MOBY KISS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MOBY KISS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • MOBY KISS
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+2.1 kn−11%+7%+119%+9%2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−2.3 kn+15%−5%−55%−5%2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−0.5 kn+16%+12%−17%+132%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.8 kn−23%−19%+87%−26%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021+0.2 kn−27%−26%+196%−8%Same speed, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−3.2 kn+102%+61%−45%+250%3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 102%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+0.9 kn−19%−14%−64%−61%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025MOBY SPA3,36810,79728,8962,26312.8116.6––
2024MOBY SPA1,7255,48413,2111,23810.7130.6––
2023not published3,36710,58829,6102,28613.0113.7––
2022not published3,47810,93335,5442,64213.597.8––
2021not published2,4167,61018,9951,49512.7127.2––
2020not published1,1103,5086,41151112.5173.2––
2019not published1,0033,16611,69074315.785.8––
2018not published3,43210,78432,2132,18114.8106.5––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025MOBY SPA2,135.89566.51+277%385 of 408181.55253.18−28%RINAA
2024MOBY SPA1,966.17546.68+260%364 of 404218.87232.85−6%RINAA
2023not published2,070.86680.04+205%356 of 386279.25233.94+19%RINAA
2022not published891.26626.32+42%244 of 39474.89252.90−70%RINAA
2021not published1,208.35815.19+48%270 of 377125.32226.00−45%RINAA
2020not published1,319.62750.91+76%266 of 387106.45217.49−51%RINAA
2019not published376.50569.03−34%142 of 3949.67222.56−96%RINAA
2018not published967.11728.92+33%220 of 361161.86184.05−12%RINAA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

MOBY KISS (IMO 7358755): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze