Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

KRITI II

IMO
7814058
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Greece
Port of registry
Chania 25
Technical efficiency
EIV 33.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: ΑΤΤΙCA FERRIES SINGLE MEMBER MARITIME S.A.

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
184
Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (+20%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
12.0
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (−98%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
160
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (−32%)
Average speed
17.9 kn
Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+12%)
Fuel per day at sea
78.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
10,814 t
CO₂ emitted
33,928 t
Distance sailed
58,945 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,294 h
137 days, 38% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2024

Set against all 404 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 208 kg/nm · median 151 (+38%)
73.1Ranks 334 of 404, lowest first237
Average speedThis ship 17.7 kn · median 15.7 (+13%)
11.7Faster than 67% of ro-pax ships22.4
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 141 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 547 (−74%)
58.4Ranks 110 of 404, lowest first1,957
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 251 g CO₂/t·nm · median 233 (+8%)
30.8Ranks 212 of 404, lowest first1,069
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports74%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU26%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
8,794 t
25.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • KRITI II
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • KRITI II
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • KRITI II
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • KRITI II
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2023→2024−0.2 kn+13%+12%−70%+1,070%Same speed, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−0.7 kn−3%−7%+62%+29%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2022−0.2 kn+3%+2%−29%−31%Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+0.3 kn−9%−7%−11%+2%0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−0.7 kn+4%+1%−14%+1%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2024ΑΤΤΙCA FERRIES SINGLE MEMBER MARITIME S.A.3,72711,70017,9251,01017.7208––
2023not published10,81433,92858,9453,29417.9184––
2022not published6,92821,75736,4961,95918.6190––
2020not published9,48329,63551,6182,74018.8184––
2019not published11,63436,32257,6843,11118.5202––
2018not published12,93240,36266,8603,49019.2193––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2024ΑΤΤΙCA FERRIES SINGLE MEMBER MARITIME S.A.141547−74%110 of 404251233+8%RINAB
2023not published12.0680−98%8 of 386160234−32%RINAB
2022not published9.29626−99%10 of 394124253−51%RINAA
2020not published13.4751−98%25 of 387179217−18%RINAA
2019not published13.1569−98%35 of 394171223−23%RINAA
2018not published13.0729−98%42 of 361170184−7%RINA–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.