Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

REGINA BALTICA

IMO: 7827225
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 15.72 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

152

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (−2%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

948

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 815 (+16%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

849

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 226 (+276%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

Ro-pax median 16.2 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

53.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,956 t

CO₂ emitted

28,541 t

Distance sailed

59,128 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,027 h

168 days, 46% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 129 kg/nm · median 150 (−14%)

69.3Ranks 134 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 14.0 kn · median 15.8 (−11%)

12.0Faster than 29% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 721 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+27%)

66.8Ranks 240 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 1,147 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+353%)

48.6Ranks 362 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU43%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU10%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,846 t

10.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

REGINA BALTICA
Ro-pax median

100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

REGINA BALTICA
Ro-pax median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

REGINA BALTICA
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,500

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

REGINA BALTICA
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.4 kn	+11%	+23%	−18%	−31%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.2 kn	−1%	−10%	−14%	−40%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−10%	−12%	+22%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−13%	−17%	+7%	+131%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	−1%	−4%	+82%	−30%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	−3%	+4%	−49%	+32,067%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.8 kn	+8%	−5%	−21%	–	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	7,057	22,192	54,634	3,916	14.0	129	–	–
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	7,774	24,476	66,585	5,304	12.6	117	–	–
2023	not published	9,145	29,081	77,207	5,611	13.8	118	–	–
2022	not published	8,333	26,509	63,307	4,494	14.1	132	–	–
2021	not published	8,956	28,541	59,128	4,027	14.7	152	–	–
2020	not published	4,995	15,677	32,498	2,165	15.0	154	–	–
2019	not published	10,188	32,044	64,090	4,573	14.0	159	–	–
2018	not published	11,957	37,530	80,953	5,108	15.8	148	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	721	567	+27%	240 of 408	1,147	253	+353%	RINA	A+B
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	1,039	547	+90%	303 of 404	464	233	+99%	RINA	A+B
2023	not published	1,729	680	+154%	348 of 386	291	234	+24%	RINA	–
2022	not published	2,189	626	+249%	373 of 394	211	253	−17%	RINA	B
2021	not published	948	815	+16%	209 of 377	849	226	+276%	RINA	B
2020	not published	1,361	751	+81%	271 of 387	996	217	+358%	RINA	B
2019	not published	4.23	569	−99%	29 of 394	4.23	223	−98%	RINA	B
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.