Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

ALMARIYA

IMO
7928811
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Cyprus
Port of registry
Limassol
Technical efficiency
EIV 19.79 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COMPANIA TRASMEDITERRANEA, SA

?
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
157
Ro-pax median 158 kg/nm (−1%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
2.43
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 729 (−100%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
3.69
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 184 (−98%)
Average speed
14.1 kn
Ro-pax median 16.1 kn (−12%)
Fuel per day at sea
52.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
8,606 t
CO₂ emitted
27,081 t
Distance sailed
54,930 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,906 h
163 days, 45% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 126 kg/nm · median 150 (−16%)
69.3Ranks 128 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 15.8 (−28%)
12.0Faster than 7% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 265 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−53%)
66.8Ranks 134 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 774 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+206%)
48.6Ranks 313 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports18%
  • From the EU35%
  • Into the EU35%
  • At berth in the EU12%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
3,049 t
11.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • ALMARIYA
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • ALMARIYA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • ALMARIYA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • ALMARIYA
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−1.7 kn−7%−19%+2%−38%1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.5 kn−8%−3%+25%−0%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023+0.5 kn−3%+0%+28%+15%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+0.7 kn+2%+9%+635%−91%0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−2.7 kn+8%−13%−66%−80%2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+0.9 kn−10%−4%−86%+44%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−1.0 kn−3%−9%+24%+592,792%1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025COMPANIA TRASMEDITERRANEA, SA4,75615,15037,7213,33011.3126––
2024COMPANIA TRASMEDITERRANEA, SA5,02115,79937,0692,85013.0135––
2023not published4,34913,69729,6872,38112.5147––
2022not published3,50211,01723,1661,92312.0151––
2021not published4681,4743,15128011.3148––
2020not published1,2794,0209,33566614.0137––
2019not published10,39732,67968,2255,20013.1152––
2018not published8,60627,08154,9303,90614.1157––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025COMPANIA TRASMEDITERRANEA, SA265567−53%134 of 408774253+206%Lloyd's RegisterB
2024COMPANIA TRASMEDITERRANEA, SA425547−22%175 of 4041,200233+415%Lloyd's RegisterB
2023not published426680−37%139 of 3861,559234+566%Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2022not published372626−41%143 of 3941,125253+345%Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2021not published4,203815+416%367 of 377886226+292%Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2020not published20,706751+2,658%385 of 3871,109217+410%Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2019not published14,407569+2,432%393 of 394354223+59%Lloyd's Register–
2018not published2.43729−100%19 of 3613.69184−98%Lloyd's Register–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.