Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

WASA EXPRESS

IMO: 8000226
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: United Marine Egypt

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

112

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (−29%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

5,185

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 751 (+590%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

976

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 217 (+349%)

Average speed

11.5 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−27%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,776 t

CO₂ emitted

15,312 t

Distance sailed

42,826 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,718 h

155 days, 42% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 192 kg/nm · median 150 (+28%)

69.3Ranks 319 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 15.8 (−31%)

12.0Faster than 6% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 44.4 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−92%)

66.8Ranks 18 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 0.75 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−100%)

48.6Ranks 20 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports84%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU16%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,471 t

16.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

WASA EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

WASA EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

WASA EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

WASA EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,0008,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.4 kn	+67%	+37%	−90%	−95%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 67%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	+5%	+7%	−58%	−46%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−7%	−7%	+20%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+7%	+7%	+13%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.7 kn	−2%	+12%	+5%	+37%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	−2%	−9%	−3%	+247%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	−7%	−3%	−2%	−4%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	United Marine Egypt	500	1,604	2,604	238	10.9	192	–	–
2024	United Marine Egypt	2,936	9,413	25,531	1,913	13.3	115	–	–
2023	not published	6,716	21,532	61,235	4,694	13.0	110	–	–
2022	not published	5,973	19,151	50,874	3,876	13.1	117	653	–
2021	not published	4,923	15,783	44,970	3,413	13.2	110	–	–
2020	not published	4,776	15,312	42,826	3,718	11.5	112	–	–
2019	not published	5,013	16,073	44,186	3,575	12.4	114	–	–
2018	not published	5,457	17,495	44,918	3,784	11.9	122	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	United Marine Egypt	44.4	567	−92%	18 of 408	0.75	253	−100%	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	United Marine Egypt	905	547	+66%	273 of 404	1,194	233	+413%	Lloyd's Register	–
2023	not published	1,664	680	+145%	346 of 386	772	234	+230%	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	7,081	815	+769%	376 of 377	410	226	+81%	DNV	B
2020	not published	5,185	751	+590%	374 of 387	976	217	+349%	DNV	A
2019	not published	1,492	569	+162%	338 of 394	666	223	+199%	DNV	A
2018	not published	1,560	729	+114%	278 of 361	894	184	+386%	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.