Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

AKRITAS

IMO: 8020599
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 2,277 t
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.66 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SALAMIS LINES LTD

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,277 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

107.6 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 104.6 kg/nm (+3%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

150

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 95.19 (+58%)

Average speed

12.6 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (−13%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,913 t

CO₂ emitted

21,994 t

22,333 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

64,263 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,082 h

212 days, 58% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 107.6 kg/nm · median 104.6 (+3%)

56.6Ranks 124 of 235, lowest first145.3

Average speedThis ship 12.6 kn · median 14.4 (−13%)

10.9Faster than 25% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 150.30 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.19 (+58%)

47.35Ranks 165 of 235, lowest first297.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports70%
From the EU10%
Into the EU12%
At berth in the EU8%

89% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (19,545 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

8.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.4 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

AKRITAS
Ro-ro median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AKRITAS
Ro-ro median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AKRITAS
Ro-ro median

50.0100150200250

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	+2%	+1%	−4%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−5%	−8%	−9%	−2%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	+6%	+2%	−6%	+5%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.9 kn	+11%	+18%	+8%	−14%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+3%	+10%	−10%	−15%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	+20%	+28%	+37%	−1%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 20%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−3.5 kn	−29%	−46%	−11%	+20%	3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 29%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	SALAMIS LINES LTD	6,913	21,994	64,263	5,082	12.6	107.6	150.30	–
2024	SALAMIS LINES LTD	7,025	21,974	66,708	5,197	12.8	105.3	172.01	–
2023	not published	8,137	25,456	73,627	5,561	13.2	110.5	176.22	–
2022	not published	8,178	25,557	78,153	5,718	13.7	104.6	167.93	–
2021	not published	6,818	21,657	72,399	5,648	12.8	94.2	196.28	–
2020	not published	7,359	23,594	80,590	6,721	12.0	91.3	229.60	–
2019	not published	4,510	14,106	59,016	5,260	11.2	76.4	231.52	–
2018	not published	7,092	22,162	66,178	4,501	14.7	107.2	193.51	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SALAMIS LINES LTD	150.30	95.19	+58%	165 of 235	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	SALAMIS LINES LTD	172.01	97.53	+76%	165 of 220	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	176.22	108.62	+62%	161 of 221	Lloyd's Register	A
2022	not published	167.93	90.62	+85%	172 of 223	Lloyd's Register	–
2021	not published	196.28	103.64	+89%	171 of 219	Lloyd's Register	–
2020	not published	229.60	102.77	+123%	192 of 238	Lloyd's Register	–
2019	not published	231.52	90.89	+155%	232 of 271	Lloyd's Register	A
2018	not published	193.51	91.03	+113%	216 of 260	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.