Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Segment

Ro-ro ships, 2025

245 ro-ro ships reported to THETIS-MRV for 2025, emitting 5.5 Mt of CO₂. Efficiency is measured as g CO₂/t·nm.

Ro-ro ships report CO₂ per tonne-mile of cargo carried, so ships running part-empty score worse.

The segment at a glance

Median ship
95.2
g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel per mile
105 kg
Median ship
Average speed
14.4 kn
Median ship, distance over hours at sea
Hours at sea
4,874
Median ship, EU-scope voyages (56% of the year)
CO₂ at berth
4.3%
Share emitted alongside in EU ports
Ships burning LNG
6
of 235 benchmarked

Operators

Who runs ro-ro ships in EU trades, and how their fleets compare. Technical shows efficiency, speed and time at sea; commercial shows the allowance bill.

#Group
1DFDS4 companies, 3 in ro-ro37−19%76.712016.55,4572.0%–
2Grimaldi Group6 companies, 2 in ro-ro30−17%79.114316.45,2745.1%–
3CLdN3 companies18−6%89.710513.84,2596.2%–
4Shiplux8 companies18−48%49.010414.44,6666.6%–
5Wallenius Wilhelmsen3 companies, 1 in ro-ro6−30%67.111613.85,4816.2%1
6Siem2 companies, 1 in ro-ro4+36%12912815.56,0722.4%–
7Bore Ltd6+27%12110414.15,0504.9%–
8AdMare Ship Management AB4+13%10813315.15,0085.2%–
9Ulusoy2 companies, 1 in ro-ro5−37%60.39214.24,9512.1%–
10MALTA MOTORWAYS OF THE SEA LIMITED5−20%75.815015.15,5864.0%–
11FLOTA SUARDIAZ, S.L.3+191%27710315.55,6493.2%–
12SALAMIS LINES LTD3+48%14110414.65,7394.5%–
13UECC2 companies4+72%1639412.65,4813.7%–
14Stena12 companies, 3 in ro-ro5+53%14511214.62,9484.8%–
15SCA Shipping AB3−53%44.87713.77,6052.0%–
16Neptune Lines Shipping and Managing Enterprises SA4+131%2209512.45,0315.1%–
17COTUNAV4+96%18611715.73,0655.7%–
18LD Armateurs SASU3+428%5037814.66,4651.9%–
19Smyril Line PF3+84%1769316.05,7642.2%–
20MSC Group3 companies, 1 in ro-ro5−24%72.611310.13,5716.9%–
21Fred. Olsen2 companies, 1 in ro-ro3+468%54111814.63,7938.9%–
22Stodig Ship Management AS4+27%1217112.25,3683.8%–
23Wagenborg3 companies, 1 in ro-ro3−66%32.88113.05,1713.7%–
24Compagnie Maritime Nantaise - MN3+531%6018314.04,1063.1%–
25Oy Trailer-Link AB5+31%1254510.43,7596.1%–

Operators with at least 3 ships in this segment. Figures cover their ships in this segment only, so a group active in several segments (MSC runs container and cruise ships) has its full total on the market page. Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership; tell us at info@navalyze.com if one is in the wrong group. Click a column to rank by it.

Efficiency by ship size

Bigger ships move a tonne of cargo for less fuel, so ships are compared within size bands. Each row is drawn against the segment median.

0.25×0.5×segment median2×4×
  • Q1: ~717 t297 g CO₂/t·nm
  • Q2: ~1,761 t161 g CO₂/t·nm
  • Q3: ~3,233 t100 g CO₂/t·nm
  • Q4: ~4,969 t76.5 g CO₂/t·nm
  • Q5: ~8,087 t49 g CO₂/t·nm

Q1 to Q5 split the fleet into fifths by average cargo carried, derived from the published ratios.

Who verifies the reports

Accredited verifiers check each ship's MRV report. Their share of the segment's ships and CO₂.

Share of CO₂Share of ships

How fuel is measured

Each ship's monitoring plan names one or more of the four MRV methods.

A · Bunker delivery notes
52%
Fuel bought, corrected by tank soundings
B · Bunker tank monitoring
37%
Tank readings on board
C · Flow meters
43%
Meters on the fuel lines to engines and boilers
D · Direct measurement
0%
CO₂ measured in the exhaust

Most common combinations

  • A30%
  • B24%
  • C19%
  • A + C14%
  • A + B + C5%
  • B + C5%
  • A + B3%

Share of 260 emission reports that name a method; a report can name several.

Notes

  • Medians and rankings use 235 full-year reports with fuel; part-year and zero-fuel reports count towards totals only.
  • THETIS reports time at sea on EU-scope voyages only, not time in port. CO₂ at berth is the closest measure of port activity it publishes.
  • Speed and distance are derived from the published ratios; THETIS has no distance column.