Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

RAMA H

IMO: 8105404
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: San Lorenzo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.62 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: White Star Shipmanagement Inc

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

39.0 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+10%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

23.94

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (−6%)

Average speed

8.6 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

8.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

279 t

CO₂ emitted

878 t

892 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

7,155 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

835 h

35 days, 10% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 39.0 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+10%)

17.4Ranks 1,502 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 8.6 kn · median 9.3 (−8%)

7.0Faster than 32% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 23.94 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (−6%)

10.14Ranks 1,185 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU43%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU5%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (465 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

RAMA H
General cargo median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

RAMA H
General cargo median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

RAMA H
General cargo median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−2%	−1%	−20%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	+29%	+17%	+124%	+28%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 29%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+4.4 kn	−18%	+57%	−64%	−4%	4.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.8 kn	−36%	−65%	−13%	−28%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 36%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.9 kn	+91%	+114%	−12%	+76%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 91%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.4 kn	+57%	+87%	+24%	+50%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 57%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.8 kn	−44%	−21%	+4%	−59%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 44%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	White Star Shipmanagement Inc	279	878	7,155	835	8.6	39.0	–	–
2024	White Star Shipmanagement Inc	357	1,120	8,999	1,053	8.5	39.6	–	–
2023	not published	123	390	4,015	431	9.3	30.7	–	–
2022	not published	421	1,333	11,211	2,294	4.9	37.6	–	–
2021	not published	760	2,406	12,860	1,470	8.7	59.1	–	–
2020	not published	449	1,420	14,556	1,861	7.8	30.9	18.82	–
2019	not published	232	729	11,785	1,827	6.4	19.7	13.09	–
2018	not published	400	1,256	11,280	2,434	4.6	35.4	25.23	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	White Star Shipmanagement Inc	23.94	25.45	−6%	1,185 of 2,706	Verifavia	A
2024	White Star Shipmanagement Inc	24.29	19.25	+26%	751 of 1,111	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	18.96	20.67	−8%	460 of 1,045	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	19.84	21.57	−8%	435 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	27.61	22.70	+22%	795 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	15.68	24.50	−36%	202 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	10.48	24.96	−58%	102 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	25.85	24.89	+4%	557 of 1,044	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.