Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

RAMA H

IMO: 8105404
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Honduras
Port of registry: San Lorenzo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.62 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: White Star Shipmanagement Inc

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

37.6

General cargo median 57.3 kg/nm (−34%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

19.8

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 21.6 (−8%)

Average speed

4.9 kn

General cargo median 10.8 kn (−55%)

Fuel per day at sea

4.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

421 t

CO₂ emitted

1,333 t

Distance sailed

11,211 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,294 h

96 days, 26% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 39.0 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+11%)

17.4Ranks 1,517 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 8.6 kn · median 9.3 (−8%)

6.9Faster than 32% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 23.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−6%)

10.2Ranks 1,187 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU39%
Into the EU56%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

57 t

4.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

RAMA H
General cargo median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

RAMA H
General cargo median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

RAMA H
General cargo median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−2%	−1%	−20%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	+29%	+17%	+124%	+28%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 29%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+4.4 kn	−18%	+57%	−64%	−4%	4.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.8 kn	−36%	−65%	−13%	−28%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 36%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.9 kn	+91%	+114%	−12%	+76%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 91%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.4 kn	+57%	+87%	+24%	+50%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 57%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.8 kn	−44%	−21%	+4%	−59%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 44%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	White Star Shipmanagement Inc	279	878	7,155	835	8.6	39.0	–	–
2024	White Star Shipmanagement Inc	357	1,120	8,999	1,053	8.5	39.6	–	–
2023	not published	123	390	4,015	431	9.3	30.7	–	–
2022	not published	421	1,333	11,211	2,294	4.9	37.6	–	–
2021	not published	760	2,406	12,860	1,470	8.7	59.1	–	–
2020	not published	449	1,420	14,556	1,861	7.8	30.9	18.8	–
2019	not published	232	729	11,785	1,827	6.4	19.7	13.1	–
2018	not published	400	1,256	11,280	2,434	4.6	35.4	25.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	White Star Shipmanagement Inc	23.9	25.5	−6%	1,187 of 2,723	Verifavia	A
2024	White Star Shipmanagement Inc	24.3	19.3	+26%	751 of 1,111	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	19.0	20.7	−8%	460 of 1,045	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	19.8	21.6	−8%	435 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	27.6	22.7	+22%	795 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	15.7	24.5	−36%	202 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	10.5	25.0	−58%	102 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	25.9	24.9	+4%	557 of 1,044	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.