Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

POETA LOPEZ ANGLADA

IMO: 8208763
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 34.70 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

152

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (−2%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

0.43

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 569 (−100%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

0.43

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 223 (−100%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−33%)

Fuel per day at sea

38.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,435 t

CO₂ emitted

23,315 t

Distance sailed

48,938 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,624 h

193 days, 53% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 145 kg/nm · median 150 (−4%)

69.3Ranks 177 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 15.8 (−33%)

12.0Faster than 4% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 5,507 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+872%)

66.8Ranks 402 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 85.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−66%)

48.6Ranks 80 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports20%
From the EU37%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,425 t

6.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

POETA LOPEZ ANGLADA
Ro-pax median

140.0145.0150.0155.0160.0165.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

POETA LOPEZ ANGLADA
Ro-pax median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

POETA LOPEZ ANGLADA
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

POETA LOPEZ ANGLADA
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−1%	+0%	+10%	+409%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	−7%	−2%	−6%	+22%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	+4%	+2%	−1%	−20%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.3 kn	−9%	+5%	+10%	+17%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.9 kn	+1%	−17%	+3%	+38%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	+7%	+10%	−26%	+157,981%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−5.7 kn	+3%	−33%	−5%	−100%	5.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	6,086	19,063	42,130	3,972	10.6	145	–	–
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	5,545	17,371	38,133	3,615	10.5	145	–	–
2023	not published	6,351	19,884	40,752	4,080	10.0	156	–	–
2022	not published	6,139	19,216	41,186	4,032	10.2	149	–	–
2021	not published	6,165	19,347	37,600	4,243	8.9	164	–	–
2020	not published	5,936	18,635	36,445	3,371	10.8	163	–	–
2019	not published	7,435	23,315	48,938	4,624	10.6	152	–	–
2018	not published	7,601	23,800	51,432	3,150	16.3	148	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	5,507	567	+872%	402 of 408	85.8	253	−66%	RINA	A+B
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	1,082	547	+98%	307 of 404	671	233	+188%	RINA	A+B
2023	not published	888	680	+31%	240 of 386	586	234	+151%	RINA	–
2022	not published	1,104	626	+76%	293 of 394	555	253	+120%	RINA	B
2021	not published	940	815	+15%	207 of 377	448	226	+98%	RINA	B
2020	not published	680	751	−9%	184 of 387	434	217	+100%	RINA	B
2019	not published	0.43	569	−100%	3 of 394	0.43	223	−100%	RINA	B
2018	not published	1,344	729	+84%	260 of 361	1,335	184	+625%	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.