Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

SUPERSTAR II

IMO: 8317942
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 32.22 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: COLOR VIKING

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Jambo Jet Maritime Co

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

134

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (−14%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

908

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 569 (+60%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

255

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 223 (+14%)

Average speed

14.4 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

46.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,586 t

CO₂ emitted

21,115 t

Distance sailed

49,328 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,429 h

143 days, 39% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 115 kg/nm · median 150 (−24%)

69.3Ranks 112 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 16.3 kn · median 15.8 (+3%)

12.0Faster than 55% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,265 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+123%)

66.8Ranks 340 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 2,803 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+1,007%)

48.6Ranks 388 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports83%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU17%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,530 t

16.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SUPERSTAR II
Ro-pax median

100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Average speed, kn

SUPERSTAR II
Ro-pax median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

SUPERSTAR II
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

SUPERSTAR II
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2025	+1.9 kn	−9%	+3%	−37%	−0%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	−5%	−4%	+453%	+75%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	−34%	−34%	−15%	−74%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 34%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	+50%	+50%	−84%	+204%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 50%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	+8%	+20%	−0%	+18%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Jambo Jet Maritime Co	2,638	8,456	22,966	1,413	16.3	115	–	–
2022	not published	4,554	14,601	36,216	2,512	14.4	126	–	–
2021	not published	869	2,787	6,552	460	14.2	133	–	–
2020	not published	1,538	4,931	7,704	535	14.4	200	–	–
2019	not published	6,586	21,115	49,328	3,429	14.4	134	–	–
2018	not published	6,100	19,558	49,473	3,802	13.0	123	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Jambo Jet Maritime Co	1,265	567	+123%	340 of 408	2,803	253	+1,007%	EMICERT	A
2022	not published	1,268	626	+102%	325 of 394	88.8	253	−65%	DNV	C
2021	not published	726	815	−11%	177 of 377	51.6	226	−77%	DNV	C
2020	not published	2,757	751	+267%	355 of 387	116	217	−47%	DNV	C
2019	not published	908	569	+60%	264 of 394	255	223	+14%	DNV	A
2018	not published	768	729	+5%	185 of 361	234	184	+27%	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.