Navalyze

Navalyze · Passenger · Ship

MARELLA DREAM

IMO
8407735
Type
Passenger ship
Flag (estimated)
Malta
Port of registry
Valletta
Technical efficiency
EEDI 21.85 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
283
Passenger median 266 kg/nm (+6%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
577
g CO₂/pax·nm · Passenger median 577 (+0%)
Average speed
15.9 kn
Passenger median 11.7 kn (+36%)
Fuel per day at sea
107.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
19,271 t
CO₂ emitted
60,255 t
Distance sailed
68,075 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,290 h
179 days, 49% of the year

Within the passenger fleet, 2020

Set against all 100 passenger ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 225 kg/nm · median 339 (−34%)
117Ranks 35 of 100, lowest first808
Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 11.0 (+25%)
5.2Faster than 70% of passenger ships16.8
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 749 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 1,169 (−36%)
334Ranks 38 of 100, lowest first74,157
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Passenger medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports77%
  • From the EU6%
  • Into the EU4%
  • At berth in the EU13%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
7,695 t
12.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Passenger median is the middle ship of all passenger ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • MARELLA DREAM
  • Passenger median

Average speed, kn

  • MARELLA DREAM
  • Passenger median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • MARELLA DREAM
  • Passenger median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2019→2020+1.1 kn−28%−21%−91%+19%1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−3.2 kn+10%−12%−17%+9%3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2020not published1,1103,5434,93535613.8225––
2019not published17,60155,02456,7054,46412.7310––
2018not published19,27160,25568,0754,29015.9283––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmPassenger medianvs PassengerRankVerifierMethods
2020not published7491,169−36%38 of 100ABSB
2019not published628589+7%94 of 177ABSB
2018not published577577+0%77 of 153ABSB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Passenger ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's passenger ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.