Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

OMAYA

IMO: 8408648
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Comoros
Port of registry: Moroni
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.55 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ANGEL M, ADMIRAL

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FUTURE MARITIME CO. S.A.

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

51.0

General cargo median 59.9 kg/nm (−15%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

33.5

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 20.7 (+62%)

Average speed

4.8 kn

General cargo median 10.5 kn (−54%)

Fuel per day at sea

5.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

145 t

CO₂ emitted

460 t

Distance sailed

2,841 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

592 h

25 days, 7% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 37.1 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+5%)

17.4Ranks 1,446 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 7.5 kn · median 9.3 (−19%)

6.9Faster than 15% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 32.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+26%)

10.2Ranks 1,901 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU16%
Into the EU77%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

29 t

6.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

OMAYA
General cargo median

20.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

OMAYA
General cargo median

0.05.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

OMAYA
General cargo median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.8 kn	+19%	−3%	−22%	+43%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+4.5 kn	−39%	+17%	+423%	−33%	4.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 39%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−5.0 kn	+21%	−40%	+18%	+107%	5.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.1 kn	−2%	−20%	+75%	+6%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021	−4.2 kn	+83%	+35%	−67%	+83%	4.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 83%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	–	–	–	–	–

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	FUTURE MARITIME CO. S.A.	432	1,352	11,640	1,543	7.5	37.1	–	–
2024	FUTURE MARITIME CO. S.A.	462	1,462	14,847	1,600	9.3	31.1	–	–
2023	not published	145	460	2,841	592	4.8	51.0	–	–
2022	not published	101	320	2,406	244	9.8	42.0	17.7	–
2021	not published	59	185	1,371	115	11.9	43.0	16.7	–
2019	not published	98	307	4,170	259	16.1	23.5	8.31	–
2018	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	FUTURE MARITIME CO. S.A.	32.1	25.5	+26%	1,901 of 2,723	Verifavia	A
2024	FUTURE MARITIME CO. S.A.	22.4	19.3	+17%	689 of 1,111	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	33.5	20.7	+62%	886 of 1,045	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	16.2	21.6	−25%	298 of 1,034	ICS Verification Services	A
2021	not published	15.2	22.7	−33%	228 of 1,142	ICS Verification Services	A
2019	not published	8.31	25.0	−67%	43 of 1,154	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.