Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SPRING

IMO: 8408650
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Comoros
Port of registry: Moroni
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.43 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: HALA. B

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Cedar Marine Services SAL

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,261 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

41.1

General cargo median 55.9 kg/nm (−26%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

30.5

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 22.7 (+34%)

Average speed

9.3 kn

General cargo median 10.9 kn (−15%)

Fuel per day at sea

9.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

379 t

CO₂ emitted

1,198 t

Distance sailed

9,223 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

988 h

41 days, 11% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 35.3 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+0%)

17.4Ranks 1,370 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 8.8 kn · median 9.3 (−5%)

6.9Faster than 36% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 21.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−15%)

10.2Ranks 975 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU42%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

46 t

3.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SPRING
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SPRING
General cargo median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SPRING
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	−18%	−11%	+87%	−23%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+3.3 kn	+32%	+131%	−32%	+38%	3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 32%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−5.7 kn	−46%	−76%	+22%	−36%	5.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 46%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.1 kn	+45%	+62%	−51%	+5%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 45%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2021	+1.8 kn	+1%	+26%	−47%	+2%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Cedar Marine Services SAL	247	787	6,999	799	8.8	35.3	–	–
2024	Cedar Marine Services SAL	161	511	3,749	467	8.0	43.0	29.9	–
2023	not published	179	568	5,516	1,184	4.7	32.5	21.4	–
2022	not published	271	858	4,531	436	10.4	59.8	31.9	–
2021	not published	379	1,198	9,223	988	9.3	41.1	30.5	–
2018	not published	702	2,199	17,356	2,323	7.5	40.5	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Cedar Marine Services SAL	21.7	25.5	−15%	975 of 2,723	Verifavia	A
2024	Cedar Marine Services SAL	28.2	19.3	+46%	861 of 1,111	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2023	not published	20.4	20.7	−1%	510 of 1,045	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2022	not published	31.9	21.6	+48%	803 of 1,034	ICS Verification Services	A
2021	not published	30.5	22.7	+34%	878 of 1,142	ICS Verification Services	A
2018	not published	29.9	24.9	+20%	674 of 1,044	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.