Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

PRINCESS SEAWAYS

IMO
8502391
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Denmark
Port of registry
Copenhagen
Technical efficiency
EEXI 29.65 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DFDS A/S · part of DFDS

?
?

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
148
Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (−6%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
474
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 626 (−24%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
149
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−41%)
Average speed
16.1 kn
Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+1%)
Fuel per day at sea
57.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
13,821 t
CO₂ emitted
43,046 t
Distance sailed
93,462 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,792 h
241 days, 66% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 156 kg/nm · median 150 (+4%)
69.3Ranks 225 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 15.8 (+1%)
12.0Faster than 53% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 186 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−67%)
66.8Ranks 113 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 370 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+46%)
48.6Ranks 237 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU47%
  • Into the EU51%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,063 t
2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • PRINCESS SEAWAYS
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • PRINCESS SEAWAYS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • PRINCESS SEAWAYS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • PRINCESS SEAWAYS
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.0 kn+9%+9%+4%+9%Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−0.1 kn−2%−3%+1%+1%Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023+0.0 kn−1%−1%−5%−64%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022+0.0 kn+0%+1%+12%−86%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021+0.1 kn−15%−15%+41%+119%Same speed, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+0.1 kn+10%+11%−36%+255%Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−0.1 kn−1%−2%−0%−25%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Bio blendDFDS A/S14,56244,27193,2995,83916.0156––
2024DFDS A/S12,81539,91489,8255,60916.0143––
2023not published12,95039,25688,6705,50316.1146––
2022not published13,82143,04693,4625,79216.1148––
2021not published12,30739,34883,4515,19016.1148––
2020not published10,27032,00359,2563,69716.0173––
2019not published14,53845,28792,4195,79915.9157––
2018not published14,78346,05292,6205,79916.0160478–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Bio blendDFDS A/S186567−67%113 of 408370253+46%DNVB
2024DFDS A/S171547−69%116 of 404370233+59%DNVC
2023not published170680−75%87 of 386347234+48%DNVC
2022not published474626−24%168 of 394149253−41%DNVC
2021not published3,338815+310%355 of 377185226−18%VerifaviaC
2020not published1,527751+103%290 of 387179217−18%VerifaviaC
2019not published431569−24%163 of 394155223−30%VerifaviaC
2018not published578729−21%160 of 361–––VerifaviaC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.