Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

LADY JAMILA

IMO: 8606109
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 6,776 t
Flag (estimated): Palau
Port of registry: Malakal Harbor
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.98 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ISMAIL SENER, HALIM M

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Mansour Management Gemi Acent

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,227 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

49.9

General cargo median 59.9 kg/nm (−17%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

21.0

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 20.7 (+2%)

Average speed

9.4 kn

General cargo median 10.5 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

302 t

CO₂ emitted

956 t

Distance sailed

6,052 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

646 h

27 days, 7% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 70.7 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+101%)

17.4Ranks 2,293 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 7.6 kn · median 9.3 (−18%)

6.9Faster than 16% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 33.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+31%)

10.2Ranks 1,974 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports19%
From the EU13%
Into the EU55%
At berth in the EU13%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

126 t

13.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LADY JAMILA
General cargo median

0.0200.0400.0600.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LADY JAMILA
General cargo median

0.05.010.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

LADY JAMILA
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+5.8 kn	−85%	−39%	+346%	+31%	5.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 85%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−7.6 kn	+854%	+88%	−80%	+21%	7.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 854%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−2.2 kn	−5%	−23%	+22%	−34%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	+12%	+15%	−11%	+32%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	−2%	−10%	−11%	+2%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+7.9 kn	+3%	+194%	−9%	+4%	7.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−4.7 kn	−10%	−57%	+40%	−1%	4.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Mansour Management Gemi Acent	376	1,203	5,320	699	7.6	70.7	33.4	–
2025	JAMILA SHIPPING & TRADING Co. Ltd.	376	1,203	5,320	699	7.6	70.7	33.4	–
2024	Mansour Management Gemi Acent	568	1,797	1,194	650	1.8	476	27.3	–
2023	not published	302	956	6,052	646	9.4	49.9	21.9	–
2022	not published	259	820	4,942	425	11.6	52.5	32.8	–
2021	not published	262	833	5,573	496	11.2	47.0	24.8	–
2020	not published	303	963	6,286	517	12.2	48.2	23.6	52%
2019	not published	323	1,012	6,916	1,622	4.3	46.7	22.8	55%
2018	not published	258	808	4,943	550	9.0	52.1	–	64%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Mansour Management Gemi Acent	–	–	–	–	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2025	JAMILA SHIPPING & TRADING Co. Ltd.	33.4	25.5	+31%	1,974 of 2,723	Verifavia	A
2024	Mansour Management Gemi Acent	25.4	19.3	+32%	798 of 1,111	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2023	not published	21.0	20.7	+2%	545 of 1,045	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2022	not published	31.8	21.6	+47%	800 of 1,034	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	24.0	22.7	+6%	648 of 1,142	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	23.6	24.5	−4%	544 of 1,167	EMICERT	A
2019	not published	22.8	25.0	−9%	474 of 1,154	EMICERT	A
2018	not published	23.1	24.9	−7%	452 of 1,044	EMICERT	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.