Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

NORDIC PEARL

IMO
8701674
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Denmark
Port of registry
KØBenhavn
Technical efficiency
EEXI 20.87 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
PEARL SEAWAYS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DFDS A/S · part of DFDS

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
129
Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (−16%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
324
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (−52%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
198
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (−16%)
Average speed
15.7 kn
Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (−2%)
Fuel per day at sea
48.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
12,659 t
CO₂ emitted
39,915 t
Distance sailed
98,361 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
6,274 h
261 days, 72% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 123 kg/nm · median 150 (−18%)
69.3Ranks 122 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 15.6 kn · median 15.8 (−1%)
12.0Faster than 46% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 48.9 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−91%)
66.8Ranks 22 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 1,022 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+304%)
48.6Ranks 348 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports95%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU5%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,816 t
4.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • NORDIC PEARL
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • NORDIC PEARL
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • NORDIC PEARL
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • NORDIC PEARL
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.2 kn−2%−1%−10%−6%Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024−0.3 kn−3%−5%+5%−84%Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023−0.4 kn−8%−10%−8%−23%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022+0.9 kn+2%+8%+89%−56%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.6 kn−6%−9%−28%+1%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020+0.1 kn+17%+17%−14%+240%Same speed, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+0.1 kn−8%−7%−8%−24%Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025part-yearDFDS A/S3,40510,62226,7501,72115.5127––
2025Alvina Shipping A/S11,44535,97293,4595,99915.6123––
2024DFDS A/S12,93340,320103,4626,71415.4125––
2023not published12,65939,91598,3616,27415.7129––
2022not published14,88746,949106,4866,62816.1140––
2021not published7,71024,71256,3943,70415.2137––
2020not published11,33935,34277,9304,93315.8146––
2019not published11,28935,19090,5725,76315.7125––
2018not published13,35041,61698,5396,32715.6136687–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025part-yearDFDS A/S–––––––DNVC
2025Alvina Shipping A/S48.9567−91%22 of 4081,022253+304%DNVC
2024DFDS A/S51.9547−91%39 of 4041,204233+417%DNVC
2023not published324680−52%117 of 386198234−16%DNVC
2022not published422626−33%155 of 394181253−28%DNVC
2021not published959815+18%211 of 377218226−3%VerifaviaC
2020not published954751+27%215 of 387144217−34%VerifaviaC
2019not published280569−51%124 of 39492.5223−58%VerifaviaC
2018not published369729−49%126 of 361–––VerifaviaC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.