Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

PETAR HEKTOROVIC

IMO: 8702446
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Croatia
Port of registry: Rijeka
Technical efficiency: EEXI 61.29 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Jadrolinija Rijeka

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

42.2

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

0.00

g CO₂/pax·nm

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

0.46

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

12.8 kn

Fuel per day at sea

13.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,702 t

CO₂ emitted

5,457 t

Distance sailed

40,290 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,140 h

131 days, 36% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 43.6 kg/nm · median 150 (−71%)

69.3Ranks 19 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 15.8 (−16%)

12.0Faster than 21% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 34.4 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−94%)

66.8Ranks 11 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 243 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−4%)

48.6Ranks 197 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports88%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU12%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

631 t

11.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PETAR HEKTOROVIC
Ro-pax median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PETAR HEKTOROVIC
Ro-pax median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

PETAR HEKTOROVIC
Ro-pax median

0.0100200300

’182018’192019’202020’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

PETAR HEKTOROVIC
Ro-pax median

0.0200400600800

’182018’192019’202020’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.6 kn	+2%	+16%	−14%	–	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.1 kn	+1%	−8%	−1%	–	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	+6%	+7%	−6%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+0%	−2%	+0%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−5%	−2%	+6%	–	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	+3%	+1%	−3%	+25%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−1%	−1%	−4%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Jadrolinija Rijeka	1,495	4,792	34,298	2,583	13.3	43.6	–	–
2024	Jadrolinija	1,708	5,475	39,943	3,421	11.7	42.8	–	–
2023	not published	1,702	5,457	40,290	3,140	12.8	42.2	–	–
2022	not published	1,714	5,495	42,990	3,361	12.8	39.9	–	–
2021	not published	1,711	5,486	42,920	3,283	13.1	39.9	–	–
2020	not published	1,696	5,437	40,388	3,215	12.6	42.0	–	–
2019	not published	1,689	5,414	41,587	3,207	13.0	40.6	–	–
2018	not published	1,776	5,692	43,338	3,357	12.9	41.0	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Jadrolinija Rijeka	34.4	567	−94%	11 of 408	243	253	−4%	Verifavia	B
2024	Jadrolinija	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	B
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	B
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	B
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	CROATIAN REGISTER OF SHIPPING	B
2020	not published	0.66	751	−100%	10 of 387	0.56	217	−100%	CROATIAN REGISTER OF SHIPPING	B
2019	not published	0.53	569	−100%	5 of 394	0.66	223	−100%	CROATIAN REGISTER OF SHIPPING	B
2018	not published	0.53	729	−100%	2 of 361	0.75	184	−100%	CROATIAN REGISTER OF SHIPPING	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.