Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

MOHSEN

IMO: 8703270
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 4,477 t
Port of registry: Lome
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: FARAH PRINCESS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Lyngate Marine Ltd.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,477 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

63.1 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+79%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

44.22

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (+74%)

Average speed

4.8 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (−48%)

Fuel per day at sea

7.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

199 t

CO₂ emitted

636 t

646 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

3,152 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

651 h

27 days, 7% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 63.1 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+79%)

17.4Ranks 2,105 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 4.8 kn · median 9.3 (−48%)

7.0Faster than 2% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 44.22 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (+74%)

10.14Ranks 2,327 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU40%
Into the EU21%
At berth in the EU35%

70% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (444 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

34.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MOHSEN
General cargo median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MOHSEN
General cargo median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

MOHSEN
General cargo median

0.050.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	+44%	+18%	−63%	+32%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 44%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.7 kn	−7%	−29%	+94%	+2%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+3.2 kn	−75%	−57%	+230%	−82%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 75%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2022	−2.1 kn	+162%	+76%	−72%	+194%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 162%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+87%	+87%	−52%	+82%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 87%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	+23%	+11%	+280%	+38%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Lyngate Marine Ltd.	199	636	3,152	651	4.8	63.1	45.09	–
2024	Lyngate Marine Ltd.	370	1,171	8,443	1,441	5.9	43.8	34.35	–
2023	not published	206	654	4,358	571	7.6	47.3	34.83	–
2022	not published	252	807	1,321	300	4.4	190.5	192.85	–
2020	not published	343	1,088	4,719	724	6.5	72.8	62.66	–
2019	not published	379	1,189	9,747	1,487	6.6	38.9	34.05	–
2018	not published	81	253	2,567	356	7.2	31.6	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Lyngate Marine Ltd.	44.22	25.45	+74%	2,327 of 2,706	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	Lyngate Marine Ltd.	33.47	19.25	+74%	957 of 1,111	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2023	not published	32.74	20.67	+58%	874 of 1,045	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	178.71	21.57	+729%	1,021 of 1,034	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	60.87	24.50	+148%	1,095 of 1,167	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2019	not published	33.36	24.96	+34%	834 of 1,154	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2018	not published	24.23	24.89	−3%	502 of 1,044	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.