Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

MOHSEN

IMO: 8703270
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 4,477 t
Flag (estimated): Togo
Port of registry: Lome
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: FARAH PRINCESS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Lyngate Marine Ltd.

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,678 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

72.8

General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (+32%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

60.9

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.5 (+148%)

Average speed

6.5 kn

General cargo median 10.7 kn (−39%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

343 t

CO₂ emitted

1,088 t

Distance sailed

4,719 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

724 h

30 days, 8% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 63.1 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+79%)

17.4Ranks 2,121 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 4.8 kn · median 9.3 (−48%)

6.9Faster than 2% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 44.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+73%)

10.2Ranks 2,339 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU81%
Into the EU12%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

68 t

6.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MOHSEN
General cargo median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MOHSEN
General cargo median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

MOHSEN
General cargo median

0.050.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	+44%	+18%	−63%	+32%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 44%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.7 kn	−7%	−29%	+94%	+2%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+3.2 kn	−75%	−57%	+230%	−82%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 75%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2022	−2.1 kn	+162%	+76%	−72%	+194%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 162%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+87%	+87%	−52%	+82%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 87%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	+23%	+11%	+280%	+38%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Lyngate Marine Ltd.	199	636	3,152	651	4.8	63.1	45.1	–
2024	Lyngate Marine Ltd.	370	1,171	8,443	1,441	5.9	43.8	34.4	–
2023	not published	206	654	4,358	571	7.6	47.3	34.8	–
2022	not published	252	807	1,321	300	4.4	191	193	–
2020	not published	343	1,088	4,719	724	6.5	72.8	62.7	–
2019	not published	379	1,189	9,747	1,487	6.6	38.9	34.1	–
2018	not published	81	253	2,567	356	7.2	31.6	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Lyngate Marine Ltd.	44.2	25.5	+73%	2,339 of 2,723	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	Lyngate Marine Ltd.	33.5	19.3	+74%	957 of 1,111	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2023	not published	32.7	20.7	+58%	874 of 1,045	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	179	21.6	+729%	1,021 of 1,034	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	60.9	24.5	+148%	1,095 of 1,167	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2019	not published	33.4	25.0	+34%	834 of 1,154	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2018	not published	24.2	24.9	−3%	502 of 1,044	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.