Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC SARISKA V

IMO: 8715857
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 38,734 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.96 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MSC SARISKA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 28,038 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

198

Container median 172 kg/nm (+15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

22.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+27%)

Average speed

14.8 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

70.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,881 t

CO₂ emitted

59,766 t

Distance sailed

95,163 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,420 h

268 days, 73% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 197 kg/nm · median 177 (+12%)

78.8Ranks 1,254 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 13.3 (+2%)

9.1Faster than 54% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−2%)

7.22Ranks 1,084 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU39%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,345 t

2.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC SARISKA V
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC SARISKA V
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC SARISKA V
Container median

15.017.520.022.525.027.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	+10%	+6%	−49%	−33%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.3 kn	+15%	+27%	−46%	−5%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	−7%	−10%	+683%	+51%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.9 kn	−17%	−27%	−86%	−17%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+1%	+4%	−36%	−10%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+1.5 kn	+6%	+18%	+18%	−2%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.5 kn	−16%	−5%	+40%	−1%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	3,669	11,470	18,588	1,364	13.6	197	15.9	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	6,470	20,254	36,156	2,547	14.2	179	23.9	–
2023	not published	10,500	33,237	67,575	5,223	12.9	155	25.1	–
2022	not published	1,450	4,582	8,630	651	13.3	168	16.6	–
2021	not published	12,272	38,786	60,997	4,021	15.2	201	20.1	–
2020	not published	18,881	59,766	95,163	6,420	14.8	198	22.4	–
2019	not published	15,094	47,361	80,398	6,046	13.3	188	23.0	–
2018	not published	12,869	40,309	57,378	4,881	11.8	224	23.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	15.9	16.3	−2%	1,084 of 2,208	DNV	C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	23.9	17.5	+37%	1,287 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023	not published	25.1	19.4	+29%	1,189 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	16.6	19.1	−13%	799 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	20.1	17.9	+12%	1,001 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	22.4	17.6	+27%	1,118 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	23.0	18.9	+22%	1,066 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	23.1	20.2	+14%	975 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.