Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- MSC Shipmanagement Ltdyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| MSC Shipmanagement Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 377 |
| CO₂ emitted | 8.8 Mt |
| Fuel per mile | 206 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 12.3 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 4.2% |
| Ships burning LNG | 13 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5
- MSC Shipmanagement Ltd16.0 (−8% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Shipmanagement Ltd | 362 | 16.0 | −8% | 209 | 12.3 | 2,991 | 4.2% | 13 |
| Segment median | 17.5 | 0% |
Ro-pax
CO₂ per transport work (pax) in g CO₂/pax·nm · segment median 547
- MSC Shipmanagement Ltd4,352 (+696% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
CO₂ per transport work (freight) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 233
- MSC Shipmanagement Ltd759 (+226% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work (pax) | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Shipmanagement Ltd | 4 | 4,352 759 freight | +696% +226% freight | 147 | 15.8 | 6,279 | 8.0% | – |
| Segment median | 547 233 freight | 0% |
Ro-ro
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 97.5
- MSC Shipmanagement Ltd77.2 (−21% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Shipmanagement Ltd | 4 | 77.2 | −21% | 116 | 9.0 | 4,227 | 7.7% | – |
| Segment median | 97.5 | 0% |
General cargo
CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 19.3
- MSC Shipmanagement Ltd52.1 (+171% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Shipmanagement Ltd | 4 | 52.1 | +171% | 71 | 8.1 | 2,347 | 8.5% | – |
| Segment median | 19.3 | 0% |
Vehicle carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.3
- MSC Shipmanagement Ltd65.2 (+18% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Shipmanagement Ltd | 2 | 65.2 | +18% | 133 | 14.3 | 1,689 | 1.3% | – |
| Segment median | 55.3 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- MSC Shipmanagement Ltd6.4 (−20% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Shipmanagement Ltd | 1 | 6.4 | −20% | 114 | 10.0 | 2,486 | 1.8% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Shipmanagement Ltd | DNV (377) | 0% | 73% | 100% | 0% |
MSC Shipmanagement Ltd: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC HAITI II | 9225251 | General cargo | 246 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 19.3 | +1178% | 11.8 | 404 t | €6k |
| GNV ATLAS | 8712520 | Ro-pax | 4,352 g CO₂/pax·nm 759 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 547 233 | +696% +226% | 15.8 | 45,246 t | €814k |
| MSC ADA F | 9190119 | General cargo | 75.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 19.3 | +292% | 8.4 | 3,712 t | €78k |
| MSC ASSUNTA III | 9243590 | Container | 44.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +104% | 5.9 | 9,508 t | €77k |
| MSC EDITH II | 9169029 | Container | 43.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +98% | 10.6 | 22,797 t | €428k |
| MSC CAITLIN | 9169043 | Container | 40.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +85% | 11.0 | 23,937 t | €488k |
| MSC IRA II | 9323493 | Container | 36.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +68% | 4.3 | 7,616 t | €135k |
| MSC MIRELLA R | 9293179 | Container | 24.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.5 | +66% | 14.5 | 33,559 t | €608k |
| MSC MANON | 9435820 | Container | 76.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | +62% | 6.9 | 10,527 t | €245k |
| MSC MIA SUMMER II | 9169067 | Container | 35.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +61% | 11.4 | 21,483 t | €442k |
| MSC ASLI | 9162631 | Container | 34.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +60% | 9.3 | 18,466 t | €324k |
| MSC EAGLE III | 9302449 | Container | 33.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +55% | 5.2 | 6,057 t | €83k |
| MSC PALATIUM III | 9336165 | Container | 33.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +55% | 12.8 | 5,460 t | €102k |
| MSC LENA F | 9347762 | Container | 72.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | +54% | 7.8 | 9,385 t | €222k |
| MSC MARYLENA II | 9169031 | Container | 33.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +53% | 8.9 | 17,618 t | €458k |
| MSC VERACRUZ | 9287924 | Container | 22.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.5 | +53% | 12.7 | 12,531 t | €226k |
| MSC SHEILA F | 9180968 | General cargo | 28.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 19.3 | +49% | 7.4 | 4,495 t | €93k |
| MSC ADRIANA II | 9169055 | Container | 32.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +48% | 11.3 | 23,284 t | €486k |
| MSC AVNI | 9756729 | Container | 15.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.7 | +46% | 15.2 | 19,063 t | €380k |
| MSC SARA ELENA | 9702261 | Container | 15.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.7 | +43% | 14.2 | 35,692 t | €636k |
| MSC FAIRFIELD | 9302633 | Container | 15.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.7 | +41% | 14.4 | 44,623 t | €893k |
| MSC RUBY | 9502960 | Container | 9.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +40% | 14.9 | 45,203 t | €756k |
| MSC VITA | 9702089 | Container | 15.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.7 | +40% | 14.0 | 46,946 t | €833k |
| MSC POLINA | 9376141 | Container | 30.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +39% | 5.1 | 9,027 t | €178k |
| MSC ANZU | 9710426 | Container | 14.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.7 | +38% | 14.5 | 43,568 t | €785k |
| MSC MADISON II | 9231119 | Container | 29.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +37% | 6.8 | 11,012 t | €246k |
| MSC SHANELLE V | 9292175 | Container | 29.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +35% | 14.0 | 23,801 t | €434k |
| MSC ARCHIMIDIS | 9315379 | Container | 14.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.7 | +35% | 11.9 | 13,104 t | €175k |
| MSC ROSSELLA III | 9320025 | Container | 29.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +33% | 9.4 | 3,605 t | €68k |
| MSC CORNELIA | 9426817 | Container | 19.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.5 | +33% | 13.6 | 44,777 t | €878k |
30 of 378 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.