Navalyze · General cargo · Ship
GOLDEN ROSE
- IMO
- 8801620
- Type
- General cargo ship
- Flag (estimated)
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Port of registry
- Basseterre
- Technical efficiency
- EEXI 11.81 g CO₂/t·nm
ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Elkashawy Group Shipping Co
2022 at a glance
From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.
Within the general cargo fleet, 2025
Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.
Where the emissions happen, 2022
THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.
- Between EU ports0%
- From the EU32%
- Into the EU67%
- At berth in the EU1%
Over the years
Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.
Fuel kg/nm
- GOLDEN ROSE
- General cargo median
Average speed, kn
- GOLDEN ROSE
- General cargo median
CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm
- GOLDEN ROSE
- General cargo median
Year on year
| Year | Average speed | Fuel kg/nm | Fuel per day at sea | Distance | CO₂ per transport work | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024→2025 | +0.6 kn | −10% | −4% | +80% | +18% | 0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2022→2024 | +0.1 kn | +14% | +15% | +69% | −19% | Same speed, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.
Every reporting year
One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.
Operation
| Year | ISM company | Fuel t | CO₂ t | Distance nm | Hours at seah | Average speedknots at sea | Fuel kg/nmthis ship | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship | Laden fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Elkashawy Group Shipping Co | 343 | 1,088 | 8,337 | 869 | 9.6 | 41.2 | – | – |
| 2024 | Elkashawy Group Shipping Co | 212 | 669 | 4,625 | 516 | 9.0 | 45.8 | – | – |
| 2022 | not published | 110 | 348 | 2,730 | 305 | 8.9 | 40.3 | – | 67% |
Benchmark and verification
| Year | ISM company | CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm | General cargo median | vs General cargo | Rank | Verifier | Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Elkashawy Group Shipping Co | 20.4 | 25.5 | −20% | 855 of 2,723 | Verifavia | A |
| 2024 | Elkashawy Group Shipping Co | 17.3 | 19.3 | −10% | 483 of 1,111 | Verifavia | A |
| 2022 | not published | 21.3 | 21.6 | −1% | 508 of 1,034 | Verifavia | A |
Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.