GREEN EGERSUND
- IMO
- 8804567
- Type
- Refrigerated cargo carrier
- Average cargo carried
- 1,119 t
- Port of registry
- Nassau
- Technical efficiency
- EEXI 20.25 g CO₂/t·nm
ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Green Shipping AS
2024 at a glance
From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,119 t of cargo on average.
Within the reefer fleet, 2024
Set against all 108 reefer ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.
Where the emissions happen, 2024
THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.
- Between EU ports24%
- From the EU24%
- Into the EU44%
- At berth in the EU9%
66% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,845 t).
Over the years
Full-year reports only. The Reefer median is the middle ship of all reefer ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.
Fuel per mile, kg/nm
- GREEN EGERSUND
- Reefer median
Average speed, kn
- GREEN EGERSUND
- Reefer median
CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm
- GREEN EGERSUND
- Reefer median
Year on year
| Year | Speed | Fuel per mile | Fuel per day | Distance | CO₂ per TW | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023→2024 | −1.6 kn | +7% | −8% | +27% | +171% | 1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2022→2023 | +0.5 kn | +3% | +8% | −4% | +2% | 0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2021→2022 | +0.9 kn | +8% | +17% | −38% | −10% | 0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2020→2021 | −5.2 kn | +17% | −22% | +21% | +90% | 5.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2019→2020 | +3.2 kn | −23% | −2% | +119% | −44% | 3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.
Every reporting year
One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.
Operation
| Year | ISM company | Fuel t | CO₂ t | Distance nm | At sea h | Speed kn | Fuel kg/nm | CO₂ g/t·nm | Laden fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025part-year | Green Shipping AS | 523 | 1,641 | 11,497 | 1,067 | 10.8 | 45.5 | 130.05 | – |
| 2024 | Green Shipping AS | 1,357 | 4,289 | 27,988 | 2,865 | 9.8 | 48.5 | 136.99 | – |
| 2023 | not published | 1,002 | 3,143 | 22,048 | 1,939 | 11.4 | 45.4 | 50.55 | – |
| 2022 | not published | 1,005 | 3,147 | 22,878 | 2,090 | 10.9 | 43.9 | 49.76 | – |
| 2021 | not published | 1,494 | 4,686 | 36,768 | 3,663 | 10.0 | 40.6 | 55.23 | – |
| 2020 | not published | 1,054 | 3,339 | 30,475 | 2,009 | 15.2 | 34.6 | 29.05 | – |
| 2019 | not published | 622 | 1,958 | 13,900 | 1,163 | 12.0 | 44.8 | 51.87 | – |
Benchmark and verification
| Year | ISM company | CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm | Reefer median | vs Reefer | Rank | Verifier | Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025part-year | Green Shipping AS | – | – | – | – | DNV | A |
| 2024 | Green Shipping AS | 136.99 | 58.69 | +133% | 101 of 108 | DNV | A |
| 2023 | not published | 50.55 | 55.59 | −9% | 55 of 135 | DNV | A |
| 2022 | not published | 49.76 | 55.27 | −10% | 57 of 143 | DNV | A |
| 2021 | not published | 55.23 | 54.99 | +0% | 81 of 158 | DNV | A |
| 2020 | not published | 29.05 | 59.07 | −51% | 4 of 149 | DNV | A |
| 2019 | not published | 51.87 | 62.58 | −17% | 45 of 147 | DNV | A |
Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Reefer ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's reefer ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.