Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

VOLZHSKIY-50

IMO
8873324
Type
General cargo ship
Flag (estimated)
Russia
Port of registry
Bolshoy Port Of Saint-Petersburg
Technical efficiency
EIV 15.10 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,636 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
29.8
General cargo median 58.4 kg/nm (−49%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
68.4
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.9 (+175%)
Average speed
5.9 kn
General cargo median 9.7 kn (−39%)
Fuel per day at sea
4.2 t/day
Fuel consumed
173 t
CO₂ emitted
555 t
Distance sailed
5,820 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
982 h
41 days, 11% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2021

Set against all 1,142 general cargo ships with a full-year 2021 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 28.0 kg/nm · median 55.9 (−50%)
34.9Ranks 24 of 1,142, lowest first96.3
Average speedThis ship 7.6 kn · median 10.9 (−30%)
8.2Faster than 6% of general cargo ships13.1
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 33.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 22.7 (+49%)
10.7Ranks 938 of 1,142, lowest first41.6
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU48%
  • Into the EU50%
  • At berth in the EU1%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
6 t
1.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • VOLZHSKIY-50
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • VOLZHSKIY-50
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • VOLZHSKIY-50
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2020→2021−0.6 kn+8%+0%−45%+2%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2020+2.3 kn−13%+21%−22%−52%2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2021not published712262,5173327.628.0––
2020not published1193804,5585588.226.034.252%
2018not published1735555,8209825.929.836.2–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2021not published33.922.7+49%938 of 1,142VerifaviaB
2020not published33.124.5+35%876 of 1,167VerifaviaB
2018not published68.424.9+175%965 of 1,044VerifaviaB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.