Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

LYUDA

IMO: 8901585
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 12,826 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.36 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SOFIYA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Rose Shipping Ltd.

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,825 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

49.5

Bulk carrier median 86.5 kg/nm (−43%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.24 (+115%)

Average speed

7.9 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (−29%)

Fuel per day at sea

9.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

930 t

CO₂ emitted

2,931 t

Distance sailed

18,773 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,382 h

99 days, 27% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 52.4 kg/nm · median 84.6 (−38%)

61.8Ranks 105 of 3,089, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 7.4 kn · median 10.6 (−30%)

8.8Faster than 4% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+59%)

4.85Ranks 2,589 of 3,089, lowest first15.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU42%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

218 t

7.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LYUDA
Bulk carrier median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

LYUDA
Bulk carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LYUDA
Bulk carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	−0%	−9%	+18%	−53%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−17%	−18%	+46%	−29%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+19%	+18%	−14%	+32%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+7%	+12%	−3%	+65%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	−1%	+11%	+25%	−29%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.9 kn	−12%	+21%	−5%	−19%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	Rose Shipping Ltd.	1,412	4,444	26,941	3,637	7.4	52.4	12.9	–
2023	not published	1,199	3,789	22,820	2,825	8.1	52.5	27.4	–
2022	not published	992	3,129	15,657	1,922	8.1	63.4	38.4	–
2021	not published	970	3,056	18,287	2,225	8.2	53.1	29.2	–
2020	not published	930	2,931	18,773	2,382	7.9	49.5	17.7	–
2019	not published	747	2,346	14,996	2,121	7.1	49.8	25.0	–
2018	not published	895	2,812	15,862	3,053	5.2	56.4	30.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Rose Shipping Ltd.	12.9	8.09	+59%	2,589 of 3,089	ICS Verification Services	A
2023	not published	27.4	8.27	+232%	3,424 of 3,548	ICS Verification Services	A
2022	not published	38.4	8.71	+341%	3,920 of 3,968	ICS Verification Services	A
2021	not published	29.2	8.57	+240%	3,411 of 3,466	ICS Verification Services	A
2020	not published	17.7	8.24	+115%	2,964 of 3,150	ICS Verification Services	A
2019	not published	25.0	8.38	+198%	3,273 of 3,360	ICS Verification Services	A
2018	not published	30.9	8.50	+263%	3,310 of 3,384	ICS Verification Services	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.