Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

GOLDEN BRIDGE

IMO: 8902345
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 32.24 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: A-Ships Management SA

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

151.8 kg/nm

Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

2,170

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+283%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

526

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+108%)

Average speed

16.8 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

61.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,280 t

CO₂ emitted

32,958 t

33,463 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

67,729 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,025 h

168 days, 46% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 151.8 kg/nm · median 150.2 (+1%)

69.3Ranks 210 of 408, lowest first232.4

Average speedThis ship 16.8 kn · median 15.8 (+6%)

12.0Faster than 61% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 2,169.60 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+283%)

66.76Ranks 387 of 408, lowest first1,568.87

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 525.68 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (+108%)

48.59Ranks 279 of 408, lowest first1,247.19

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports83%
From the EU6%
Into the EU6%
At berth in the EU5%

16% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,197 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.5 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GOLDEN BRIDGE
Ro-pax median

140.0160.0180.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GOLDEN BRIDGE
Ro-pax median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

GOLDEN BRIDGE
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

GOLDEN BRIDGE
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,0008,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	+3%	+5%	−0%	–	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−3.3 kn	−5%	−20%	+13%	–	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+3.0 kn	−0%	+18%	−22%	–	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+3.4 kn	+9%	+37%	+38%	+106%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.4 kn	−7%	−21%	+68%	−62%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.4 kn	−18%	−25%	+0%	+90%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	A-Ships Management SA	10,280	32,958	67,729	4,025	16.8	151.8	–	–
2024	A-Ships Management SA	10,056	31,892	68,062	4,144	16.4	147.7	–	–
2023	not published	9,299	29,069	60,039	3,050	19.7	154.9	–	–
2022	not published	11,961	37,763	77,127	4,612	16.7	155.1	–	–
2021	not published	7,952	25,109	55,875	4,211	13.3	142.3	–	–
2020	not published	5,103	16,127	33,306	2,123	15.7	153.2	–	–
2019	not published	6,235	19,529	33,204	1,938	17.1	187.8	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	A-Ships Management SA	2,169.60	566.51	+283%	387 of 408	525.68	253.18	+108%	ICS Verification Services	A
2024	A-Ships Management SA	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	ICS Verification Services	A
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	ICS Verification Services	A
2022	not published	4,978.22	626.32	+695%	390 of 394	1,134.08	252.90	+348%	ICS Verification Services	A
2021	not published	2,420.11	815.19	+197%	345 of 377	485.49	226.00	+115%	ICS Verification Services	A
2020	not published	6,350.50	750.91	+746%	376 of 387	585.92	217.49	+169%	ICS Verification Services	A
2019	not published	3,336.86	569.03	+486%	377 of 394	2,592.44	222.56	+1,065%	ICS Verification Services	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.