Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

GOLDEN BRIDGE

IMO: 8902345
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 32.24 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: A-Ships Management SA

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

155

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

–

g CO₂/pax·nm

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

19.7 kn

Fuel per day at sea

73.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,299 t

CO₂ emitted

29,069 t

Distance sailed

60,039 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,050 h

127 days, 35% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 152 kg/nm · median 150 (+1%)

69.3Ranks 210 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 16.8 kn · median 15.8 (+6%)

12.0Faster than 61% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 2,170 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+283%)

66.8Ranks 387 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 526 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+108%)

48.6Ranks 279 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports80%
From the EU7%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,398 t

4.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GOLDEN BRIDGE
Ro-pax median

140.0160.0180.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GOLDEN BRIDGE
Ro-pax median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

GOLDEN BRIDGE
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

GOLDEN BRIDGE
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,0008,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	+3%	+5%	−0%	–	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−3.3 kn	−5%	−20%	+13%	–	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+3.0 kn	−0%	+18%	−22%	–	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+3.4 kn	+9%	+37%	+38%	+106%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.4 kn	−7%	−21%	+68%	−62%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.4 kn	−18%	−25%	+0%	+90%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	A-Ships Management SA	10,280	32,958	67,729	4,025	16.8	152	–	–
2024	A-Ships Management SA	10,056	31,892	68,062	4,144	16.4	148	–	–
2023	not published	9,299	29,069	60,039	3,050	19.7	155	–	–
2022	not published	11,961	37,763	77,127	4,612	16.7	155	–	–
2021	not published	7,952	25,109	55,875	4,211	13.3	142	–	–
2020	not published	5,103	16,127	33,306	2,123	15.7	153	–	–
2019	not published	6,235	19,529	33,204	1,938	17.1	188	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	A-Ships Management SA	2,170	567	+283%	387 of 408	526	253	+108%	ICS Verification Services	A
2024	A-Ships Management SA	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	ICS Verification Services	A
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	ICS Verification Services	A
2022	not published	4,978	626	+695%	390 of 394	1,134	253	+348%	ICS Verification Services	A
2021	not published	2,420	815	+197%	345 of 377	485	226	+115%	ICS Verification Services	A
2020	not published	6,351	751	+746%	376 of 387	586	217	+169%	ICS Verification Services	A
2019	not published	3,337	569	+486%	377 of 394	2,592	223	+1,065%	ICS Verification Services	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.