Navalyze

Navalyze · Passenger · Ship

SILVER CLOUD

IMO
8903923
Type
Passenger ship
Port of registry
Nassau
Technical efficiency
EEXI 18.14 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IC
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
109.9 kg/nm
Passenger median 270.1 kg/nm (−59%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
1,741
g CO₂/pax·nm · Passenger median 625 (+178%)
Average speed
12.4 kn
Passenger median 13.7 kn (−9%)
Fuel per day at sea
32.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
872 t
CO₂ emitted
2,794 t
Distance sailed
7,928 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
638 h
27 days, 7% of the year

Within the passenger fleet, 2023

Set against all 202 passenger ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 109.9 kg/nm · median 270.1 (−59%)
76.6Ranks 35 of 202, lowest first454.7
Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 13.7 (−9%)
10.4Faster than 34% of passenger ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,741.03 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 625.29 (+178%)
330.27Ranks 177 of 202, lowest first1,930.62
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Passenger medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports23%
  • From the EU34%
  • Into the EU31%
  • At berth in the EU12%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
12.2%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Passenger median is the middle ship of all passenger ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • SILVER CLOUD
  • Passenger median

Average speed, kn

  • SILVER CLOUD
  • Passenger median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • SILVER CLOUD
  • Passenger median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2022→2023+2.2 kn−3%+18%−61%−10%2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2022+2.0 kn−10%+12%+4%+10%2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−0.5 kn+1%−5%−1%−2%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2023not published8722,7947,92863812.4109.9––
2022not published2,2997,37020,2681,98410.2113.4––
2019not published2,4647,89919,4692,3758.2126.6––
2018not published2,4817,95319,7462,2648.7125.7––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmPassenger medianvs PassengerRankVerifierMethods
2023not published1,741.03625.29+178%177 of 202DNVB
2022not published1,938.71830.76+133%159 of 187DNVB
2019not published1,759.13589.20+199%166 of 177DNVB
2018not published1,802.79577.11+212%150 of 153DNVB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Passenger ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's passenger ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

SILVER CLOUD (IMO 8903923): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2023 | Navalyze