Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

MARFRET NIOLON

IMO: 8912388
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 1,186 t
Port of registry: Luxembourg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.32 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MARSEILLE FRET SA

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,186 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

42.7 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 104.6 kg/nm (−59%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

113

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 95.19 (+18%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (−23%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,173 t

CO₂ emitted

9,930 t

10,085 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

74,357 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,710 h

280 days, 77% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 42.7 kg/nm · median 104.6 (−59%)

56.6Ranks 13 of 235, lowest first145.3

Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 14.4 (−23%)

10.9Faster than 11% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 112.61 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.19 (+18%)

47.35Ranks 133 of 235, lowest first297.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports95%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU4%

46% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,541 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MARFRET NIOLON
Ro-ro median

40.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MARFRET NIOLON
Ro-ro median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MARFRET NIOLON
Ro-ro median

0.0100200300400

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	+0%	−2%	+16%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−9%	−9%	−5%	−25%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	+0%	−5%	+52%	+15%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	−2%	+3%	+4%	−36%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	−10%	−6%	+26%	−40%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+6%	+7%	−20%	+122%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−9%	−8%	+7%	−33%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MARSEILLE FRET SA	3,173	9,930	74,357	6,710	11.1	42.7	112.61	–
2024	Compagnie Maritime Marfret	2,742	8,590	64,271	5,734	11.2	42.7	120.81	–
2023	not published	3,175	9,944	67,596	6,007	11.3	47.0	160.95	–
2022	not published	2,086	6,552	44,558	3,767	11.8	46.8	140.16	–
2021	not published	2,050	6,416	42,788	3,802	11.3	47.9	219.84	–
2020	not published	1,813	5,745	33,947	3,168	10.7	53.4	366.49	–
2019	not published	2,151	6,723	42,615	4,025	10.6	50.5	165.27	–
2018	not published	2,198	6,857	39,785	3,805	10.5	55.2	247.95	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MARSEILLE FRET SA	112.61	95.19	+18%	133 of 235	DNV	A
2024	Compagnie Maritime Marfret	120.81	97.53	+24%	130 of 220	DNV	A
2023	not published	160.95	108.62	+48%	151 of 221	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	140.16	90.62	+55%	157 of 223	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	219.84	103.64	+112%	180 of 219	DNV	A
2020	not published	366.49	102.77	+257%	218 of 238	DNV	A
2019	not published	165.27	90.89	+82%	209 of 271	DNV	A
2018	not published	247.95	91.03	+172%	230 of 260	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.