Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

NORDANHAV

IMO
8914130
Type
General cargo ship
Flag (estimated)
Faroe Islands
Port of registry
Torshavn
Technical efficiency
EIV 12.70 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
41.2
General cargo median 58.4 kg/nm (−29%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
28.4
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.9 (+14%)
Average speed
7.4 kn
General cargo median 9.7 kn (−24%)
Fuel per day at sea
7.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,250 t
CO₂ emitted
3,905 t
Distance sailed
30,329 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,097 h
171 days, 47% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,167 general cargo ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 31.2 kg/nm · median 55.1 (−43%)
36.0Ranks 50 of 1,167, lowest first90.9
Average speedThis ship 8.3 kn · median 10.7 (−22%)
8.2Faster than 11% of general cargo ships12.9
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 21.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 24.5 (−13%)
11.3Ranks 428 of 1,167, lowest first48.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports29%
  • From the EU29%
  • Into the EU34%
  • At berth in the EU8%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
286 t
7.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • NORDANHAV
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • NORDANHAV
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • NORDANHAV
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2019→2020+1.3 kn−26%−11%+14%−20%1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−0.4 kn+3%−3%−0%−6%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2020not published1,0743,44434,3754,1258.331.2––
2019not published1,2803,99530,2284,3357.042.4––
2018not published1,2503,90530,3294,0977.441.2––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2020not published21.324.5−13%428 of 1,167Bureau VeritasB+C
2019not published26.725.0+7%640 of 1,154Bureau VeritasB+C
2018not published28.424.9+14%627 of 1,044Bureau VeritasB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.