Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

PATRIA SEAWAYS

IMO
8917390
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Lithuania
Port of registry
Klaipeda
Technical efficiency
EEXI 33.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IB

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: AB DFDS Seaways · part of DFDS

?
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,274 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
88.8
Ro-pax median 158 kg/nm (−44%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
3,292
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 729 (+352%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
–
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
14.5 kn
Ro-pax median 16.1 kn (−10%)
Fuel per day at sea
30.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
5,931 t
CO₂ emitted
18,568 t
Distance sailed
66,768 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,609 h
192 days, 53% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 88.2 kg/nm · median 150 (−41%)
69.3Ranks 77 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 15.3 kn · median 15.8 (−3%)
12.0Faster than 42% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 4,557 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+704%)
66.8Ranks 400 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 62.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−76%)
48.6Ranks 49 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports84%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU16%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
2,893 t
15.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • PATRIA SEAWAYS
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • PATRIA SEAWAYS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • PATRIA SEAWAYS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • PATRIA SEAWAYS
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+4.9 kn−18%+21%+114%−8%4.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−3.3 kn+22%−8%−54%+78%3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+0.6 kn+3%+8%+0%+227%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−1.7 kn−5%−16%−34%+4%1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−0.1 kn−1%−2%+1%−1%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020+0.3 kn−7%−5%+17%−32%0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+0.1 kn+11%+11%−12%−64%Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025AB DFDS Seaways4,02912,88545,6832,97715.388.2––
2024AB DFDS Seaways2,3117,24121,3812,06010.4108––
2023not published4,08312,85946,0743,37113.788.6––
2022not published3,95712,53645,8453,51213.186.3––
2021not published6,33120,04169,6874,70514.890.8––
2020not published6,32819,78269,1184,63214.991.5––
2019not published5,78918,12258,8964,04214.698.3––
2018not published5,93118,56866,7684,60914.588.8218–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025AB DFDS Seaways4,557567+704%400 of 40862.0253−76%DNVB
2024AB DFDS Seaways4,942547+804%383 of 404201233−14%DNVB+C
2023not published2,770680+307%375 of 38661.7234−74%DNVB+C
2022not published848626+35%239 of 394116253−54%DNVB+C
2021not published812815−0%187 of 377138226−39%VerifaviaB+C
2020not published818751+9%201 of 387140217−36%VerifaviaB+C
2019not published1,201569+111%318 of 394149223−33%VerifaviaB+C
2018not published3,292729+352%331 of 361–––VerifaviaB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.