Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

ANNABELLA

IMO: 8919788
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Comoros
Port of registry: Moroni
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.50 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ANNABELLA I

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: VRS MARITIME SERVICES LTD

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,177 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

48.1

General cargo median 57.3 kg/nm (−16%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

24.6

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 21.6 (+14%)

Average speed

10.3 kn

General cargo median 10.8 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

510 t

CO₂ emitted

1,613 t

Distance sailed

10,604 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,028 h

43 days, 12% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 81.4 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+131%)

17.4Ranks 2,497 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 9.5 kn · median 9.3 (+2%)

6.9Faster than 54% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 31.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+25%)

10.2Ranks 1,890 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU36%
Into the EU61%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

51 t

3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ANNABELLA
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ANNABELLA
General cargo median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

ANNABELLA
General cargo median

10.015.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+70%	+71%	−62%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 70%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.1 kn	−18%	+5%	+14%	−13%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.9 kn	+22%	−13%	−10%	+37%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+22%	+17%	+39%	+64%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.9 kn	−25%	−37%	+24%	−44%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 25%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+2.9 kn	−5%	+24%	−51%	+7%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.2 kn	+4%	+33%	+78%	+4%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	VRS MARITIME SERVICES LTD	337	1,064	4,141	435	9.5	81.4	–	–
2024	VRS MARITIME SERVICES LTD	523	1,652	10,941	1,151	9.5	47.8	31.8	–
2023	not published	560	1,774	9,558	1,297	7.4	58.6	33.8	–
2022	not published	510	1,613	10,604	1,028	10.3	48.1	24.6	–
2021	not published	301	949	7,655	706	10.8	39.3	15.3	–
2020	not published	327	1,022	6,198	488	12.7	52.7	27.1	–
2019	not published	710	2,230	12,754	1,308	9.8	55.7	28.7	–
2018	not published	384	1,203	7,167	940	7.6	53.6	26.5	61%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	VRS MARITIME SERVICES LTD	31.9	25.5	+25%	1,890 of 2,723	Verifavia	A
2024	VRS MARITIME SERVICES LTD	29.6	19.3	+54%	891 of 1,111	ICS Verification Services	A
2023	not published	33.8	20.7	+64%	891 of 1,045	ICS Verification Services	A
2022	not published	24.6	21.6	+14%	624 of 1,034	ICS Verification Services	A
2021	not published	15.0	22.7	−34%	223 of 1,142	ICS Verification Services	A
2020	not published	27.0	24.5	+10%	694 of 1,167	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2019	not published	25.2	25.0	+1%	584 of 1,154	EMICERT	A
2018	not published	24.3	24.9	−2%	505 of 1,044	EMICERT	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.