Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

SILJA EUROPA

IMO: 8919805
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: Tallinn
Technical efficiency: EIV 2.32 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HT Shipmanagement OU

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

–

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

–

g CO₂/pax·nm

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

–

Fuel per day at sea

–

Fuel consumed

2,485 t

CO₂ emitted

7,967 t

8,089 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

–

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

0 h

0 days, 0% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2022

Set against all 394 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 495.5 kg/nm · median 157.2 (+215%)

79.7Ranks 393 of 394, lowest first241.1

Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 16.0 (−14%)

12.3Faster than 24% of ro-pax ships22.6

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 392.96 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 626.32 (−37%)

71.52Ranks 149 of 394, lowest first1,606.41

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 51.85 g CO₂/t·nm · median 252.90 (−79%)

66.27Ranks 26 of 394, lowest first1,134.70

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU100%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,967 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

100.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SILJA EUROPA
Ro-pax median

0.010,00020,00030,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SILJA EUROPA
Ro-pax median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

SILJA EUROPA
Ro-pax median

0.0100200300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

SILJA EUROPA
Ro-pax median

2004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2023	−3.9 kn	+5,092%	+3,598%	−99%	–	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5,092%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.1 kn	+46%	+72%	−36%	−55%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 46%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.3 kn	−31%	−38%	+67%	+33%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+59%	+57%	−63%	+97%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 59%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	−13%	−14%	+1%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	HT Shipmanagement OU	2,485	7,967	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	HT Shipmanagement OU	2,800	8,976	–	0	–	–	–	–
2023LNG	not published	3,317	9,437	129	13	9.9	25,725.0	–	–
2022	not published	6,946	21,320	14,019	1,013	13.8	495.5	–	–
2021	not published	7,463	23,531	22,002	1,876	11.7	339.2	–	–
2020	not published	6,482	20,432	13,196	1,015	13.0	491.2	–	–
2019	not published	11,093	34,955	35,877	2,737	13.1	309.2	–	–
2018	not published	12,566	39,596	35,422	2,679	13.2	354.8	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	HT Shipmanagement OU	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	C
2024	HT Shipmanagement OU	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	C
2023LNG	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	C
2022	not published	392.96	626.32	−37%	149 of 394	51.85	252.90	−79%	Verifavia	C
2021	not published	876.23	815.19	+7%	195 of 377	81.13	226.00	−64%	Verifavia	C
2020	not published	660.30	750.91	−12%	178 of 387	47.10	217.49	−78%	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	334.90	569.03	−41%	134 of 394	39.48	222.56	−82%	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	372.50	728.92	−49%	127 of 361	44.52	184.05	−76%	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.