Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

SILJA EUROPA

IMO: 8919805
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Estonia
Port of registry: Tallinn
Technical efficiency: EIV 2.32 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HT Shipmanagement OU

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

496

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (+215%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

393

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 626 (−37%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

51.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−79%)

Average speed

13.8 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

164.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,946 t

CO₂ emitted

21,320 t

Distance sailed

14,019 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,013 h

42 days, 12% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2022

Set against all 394 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 496 kg/nm · median 157 (+215%)

79.7Ranks 393 of 394, lowest first241

Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 16.0 (−14%)

12.3Faster than 24% of ro-pax ships22.6

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 393 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 626 (−37%)

71.5Ranks 149 of 394, lowest first1,606

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 51.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−79%)

66.3Ranks 26 of 394, lowest first1,135

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports43%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU57%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

11,688 t

54.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SILJA EUROPA
Ro-pax median

0.010,00020,00030,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SILJA EUROPA
Ro-pax median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

SILJA EUROPA
Ro-pax median

0.0100200300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

SILJA EUROPA
Ro-pax median

2004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2023	−3.9 kn	+5,092%	+3,598%	−99%	–	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5,092%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.1 kn	+46%	+72%	−36%	−55%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 46%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.3 kn	−31%	−38%	+67%	+33%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+59%	+57%	−63%	+97%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 59%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	−13%	−14%	+1%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	HT Shipmanagement OU	2,485	7,967	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	HT Shipmanagement OU	2,800	8,976	–	0	–	–	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	3,317	9,437	129	13	9.9	25,725	–	–
2022	not published	6,946	21,320	14,019	1,013	13.8	496	–	–
2021	not published	7,463	23,531	22,002	1,876	11.7	339	–	–
2020	not published	6,482	20,432	13,196	1,015	13.0	491	–	–
2019	not published	11,093	34,955	35,877	2,737	13.1	309	–	–
2018	not published	12,566	39,596	35,422	2,679	13.2	355	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	HT Shipmanagement OU	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	C
2024	HT Shipmanagement OU	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	C
2022	not published	393	626	−37%	149 of 394	51.9	253	−79%	Verifavia	C
2021	not published	876	815	+7%	195 of 377	81.1	226	−64%	Verifavia	C
2020	not published	660	751	−12%	178 of 387	47.1	217	−78%	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	335	569	−41%	134 of 394	39.5	223	−82%	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	373	729	−49%	127 of 361	44.5	184	−76%	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.