Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

ALICE

IMO: 8927979
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 2,354 t
Flag (estimated): Palau
Port of registry: Malakal Harbor
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.14 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Black Sea Shipping Management

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,848 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

28.5

General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (−48%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

30.9

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.5 (+26%)

Average speed

6.5 kn

General cargo median 10.7 kn (−39%)

Fuel per day at sea

4.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

31 t

CO₂ emitted

99 t

Distance sailed

1,087 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

167 h

7 days, 2% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 19.4 kg/nm · median 35.2 (−45%)

17.4Ranks 376 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 7.1 kn · median 9.3 (−24%)

6.9Faster than 11% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 23.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−8%)

10.2Ranks 1,130 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU51%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

15 t

47% of all fuel; 53% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ALICE
General cargo median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ALICE
General cargo median

2.04.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

ALICE
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−11%	−11%	−44%	+25%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	−29%	−24%	+88%	−43%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	+22%	+36%	−32%	+21%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 22%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2022	−0.5 kn	−12%	−18%	+352%	−13%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+2.6 kn	−13%	+42%	−56%	−12%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	+8%	−11%	+15%	+6%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Black Sea Shipping Management	68	219	3,523	497	7.1	19.4	26.4	–
2024	Black Sea Shipping Management	137	440	6,331	879	7.2	21.7	–	–
2023	not published	103	329	3,359	500	6.7	30.5	–	–
2022	not published	123	395	4,909	816	6.0	25.1	30.2	–
2020	not published	31	99	1,087	167	6.5	28.5	32.1	47%
2019	not published	80	257	2,445	620	3.9	32.8	35.8	26%
2018	not published	64	206	2,117	440	4.8	30.4	–	48%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Black Sea Shipping Management	23.4	25.5	−8%	1,130 of 2,723	Verifavia	A
2024	Black Sea Shipping Management	18.7	19.3	−3%	534 of 1,111	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	32.8	20.7	+58%	875 of 1,045	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	27.0	21.6	+25%	697 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	30.9	24.5	+26%	829 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	35.0	25.0	+40%	856 of 1,154	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	33.0	24.9	+33%	726 of 1,044	Verifavia	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.