Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

GRIGORY MALOV

IMO: 8986365
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 2,242 t
Technical efficiency: EIV 15.34 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Spring Marine Denizcilik VE TIC. LTD. STI.

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,242 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

33.8 kg/nm

General cargo median 58.7 kg/nm (−42%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

46.62

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 19.25 (+142%)

Average speed

7.4 kn

General cargo median 10.5 kn (−30%)

Fuel per day at sea

6.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

228 t

CO₂ emitted

732 t

743 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

6,749 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

914 h

38 days, 10% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,111 general cargo ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 33.8 kg/nm · median 58.7 (−42%)

34.9Ranks 89 of 1,111, lowest first87.0

Average speedThis ship 7.4 kn · median 10.5 (−30%)

7.8Faster than 8% of general cargo ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 46.62 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 19.25 (+142%)

7.51Ranks 1,037 of 1,111, lowest first39.26

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU54%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU5%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (394 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GRIGORY MALOV
General cargo median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

GRIGORY MALOV
General cargo median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

GRIGORY MALOV
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	+11%	+7%	+452%	+50%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	−16%	−13%	−95%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−0%	−6%	+103%	+53%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−6.6 kn	+105%	+10%	−67%	+125%	6.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 105%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+7.0 kn	−53%	−9%	+76%	−63%	7.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 53%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.6 kn	−15%	+33%	−12%	−35%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	Spring Marine Denizcilik VE TIC. LTD. STI.	228	732	6,749	914	7.4	33.8	48.39	–
2023	not published	37	119	1,222	160	7.6	30.4	33.87	–
2022	not published	891	2,857	24,494	3,340	7.3	36.4	42.44	–
2021	not published	441	1,413	12,086	1,547	7.8	36.5	35.82	–
2020	not published	654	2,096	36,753	2,550	14.4	17.8	12.30	–
2019	not published	791	2,567	20,875	2,811	7.4	37.9	45.80	–
2018	not published	1,060	3,399	23,834	4,954	4.8	44.5	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Spring Marine Denizcilik VE TIC. LTD. STI.	46.62	19.25	+142%	1,037 of 1,111	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2023	not published	31.16	20.67	+51%	847 of 1,045	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2022	not published	40.62	21.57	+88%	903 of 1,034	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	26.50	22.70	+17%	751 of 1,142	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	11.77	24.50	−52%	126 of 1,167	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2019	not published	31.96	24.96	+28%	800 of 1,154	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2018	not published	49.12	24.89	+97%	906 of 1,044	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.